The scope of this page is feeding and swallowing disorders in infants, preschool children, and school-age children up to 21 years of age.
See the Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing Evidence Map for summaries of the available research on this topic.
Feeding is the process involving any aspect of eating or drinking, including gathering and preparing food and liquid for intake, sucking or chewing, and swallowing (Arvedson & Brodsky, 2002). Feeding provides children and caregivers with opportunities for communication and social experiences that form the basis for future interactions (Lefton-Greif, 2008).
Swallowing is a complex process during which saliva, liquids, and foods are transported from the mouth into the stomach while keeping the airway protected. Swallowing is commonly divided into the following four phases (Arvedson & Brodsky, 2002; Logemann, 1998):
Feeding disorders are problems with a range of eating activities that may or may not include problems with swallowing. Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is “impaired oral intake that is not age-appropriate and is associated with medical, nutritional, feeding skill, and/or psychosocial dysfunction” (Goday et al., 2019). PFD may be associated with oral sensory function (Goday et al., 2019) and can be characterized by one or more of the following behaviors (Arvedson, 2008):
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are the preferred providers of dysphagia services and are integral members of an interprofessional team to diagnose and manage feeding and swallowing disorders.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 2016), ARFID is an eating or a feeding disturbance (e.g., apparent lack of interest in eating or in food, avoidance based on the sensory characteristics of food, concern about aversive consequences of eating), as manifested by persistent failure to meet appropriate nutritional and/or energy needs associated with one (or more) of the following:
SLPs may screen or make referrals for ARFID but do not diagnose this disorder. ARFID is distinct from PFD in that ARFID does not include children whose primary challenge is a skill deficit (e.g., dysphagia) and requires that the severity of the eating difficulty exceeds the severity usually associated with a certain condition (e.g., Down syndrome). Additionally, the definition of ARFID considers nutritional deficiency, whereas PFD does not (Goday et al., 2019). ARFID and PFD may exist separately or concurrently.
Dysphagia can occur in one or more of the four phases of swallowing and can result in aspiration—the passage of food, liquid, or saliva into the trachea—and retrograde flow of food into the nasal cavity.
The long-term consequences of feeding and swallowing disorders can include
Incidence refers to the number of new cases identified in a specified time period.
Prevalence refers to the number of children who are living with feeding and swallowing problems in a given time period.
It is assumed that the incidence of feeding and swallowing disorders is increasing because of the improved survival rates of children with complex and medically fragile conditions (Lefton-Greif, 2008; Lefton-Greif et al., 2006; Newman et al., 2001) and the improved longevity of persons with dysphagia that develops during childhood (Lefton-Greif et al., 2017).
Estimated reports of the incidence and prevalence of pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders vary widely due to factors including variations in the conditions and populations sampled; how pediatric feeding disorders, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID; please see above for further details), and/or swallowing impairment are defined; and the choice of assessment methods and measures (Arvedson, 2008; Lefton-Greif, 2008). The data below reflect this variability.
Disruptions in swallowing may occur in any or all phases of swallowing. Signs and symptoms vary based on the phase(s) affected and the child’s age and developmental level. They may include the following:
Underlying etiologies associated with pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders include
Atypical eating and drinking behaviors can develop in association with dysphagia, aspiration, or a choking event. They may also arise in association with sensory disturbances (e.g., hypersensitivity to textures), stress reactions (e.g., consistent or repetitive gagging), traumatic events increasing anxiety, or undetected pain (e.g., teething, tonsillitis). See, for example, Manikam and Perman (2000).
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play a central role in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of infants and children with swallowing and feeding disorders. The professional roles and activities in speech-language pathology include clinical/educational services (diagnosis, assessment, planning, and treatment); prevention and advocacy; and education, administration, and research. See ASHA’s Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology (ASHA, 2016).
Appropriate roles for SLPs include
Experience in adult swallowing disorders does not qualify an individual to provide swallowing assessment and intervention for children. Understanding adult anatomy and physiology of the swallow provides a basis for understanding dysphagia in children, but SLPs require knowledge and skills specific to pediatric populations. As indicated in the ASHA Code of Ethics (ASHA, 2023), SLPs who serve a pediatric population should be educated and appropriately trained to do so.
The causes and consequences of dysphagia cross traditional boundaries between professional disciplines. Therefore, management of dysphagia may require input of multiple specialists serving on an interprofessional team. Members of the dysphagia team may vary across settings.
The SLP frequently serves as coordinator for the team management of dysphagia. SLPs lead the team in
School-based SLPs play a significant role in the management of feeding and swallowing disorders. SLPs provide assessment and treatment to the student as well as education to parents, teachers, and other professionals who work with the student daily. SLPs develop and typically lead the school-based feeding and swallowing team.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA, 2004) protects the rights of students with disabilities, ensures free appropriate public education, and mandates services for students who may have health-related disorders that impact their ability to fully participate in the educational curriculum. Feeding, swallowing, and dysphagia are not specifically mentioned in IDEA; however, school districts must protect the health and safety of students with disabilities in the schools, including those with feeding and swallowing disorders. According to IDEA, students with disabilities may receive school health and nursing as related services to address safe mealtimes regardless of their special education classification.
Although feeding, swallowing, and dysphagia are not specifically mentioned in IDEA, the U.S. Department of Education acknowledges that chronic health conditions could deem a student eligible for special education and related services under the disability category “Other Health Impairment,” if the disorder interferes with the student’s strength, vitality, or alertness and limits the student’s ability to access the educational curriculum.
Students who do not qualify for IDEA services and have swallowing and feeding disorders may receive services through the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, under the provision that it substantially limits one or more of life’s major activities.
School districts that participate in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program in the schools, known as the National School Lunch Program, must follow regulations [see 7 C.F.R. § 210.10(m)(1)] to provide substitutions or modifications in meals for children who are considered disabled and whose disabilities restrict their diet (Meal Requirements for Lunches and Requirements for Afterschool Snacks, 2021).
For more information, see also Accommodating Children With Disabilities in the School Meal Programs: Guidance for School Food Service Professionals [PDF] (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2017).
 Here, we cite the most current, updated version of 7 C.F.R. § 210.10 (from 2021), in which the section letters and numbers are “210.10(m)(1).” The original version was codified in 2011—and has had many updates since. Those section letters and numbers from 2011 are “210.10(g)(1)” and can be found at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title7-vol4/pdf/CFR-2011-title7-vol4-sec210-10.pdf.
IDEA protects the rights of students with disabilities and ensures free appropriate public education. Feeding and swallowing disorders may be considered educationally relevant and part of the school system’s responsibility to ensure
Please see Clinical Evaluation: Schools section below for further details.
See the Assessment section of the Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
Assessment and treatment of swallowing and swallowing disorders may require the use of appropriate personal protective equipment and universal precautions.
Consistent with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ASHA, 2023; WHO, 2001), a comprehensive assessment is conducted to identify and describe
See Person-Centered Focus on Function: Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing [PDF] for examples of assessment data consistent with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.
Clinicians may consider the following factors when assessing feeding and swallowing disorders in the pediatric population:
As infants and children grow and develop, the absolute and relative size and shape of oral and pharyngeal structures change. See figures below.
Anatomical and physiological differences include the following:
Chewing matures as the child develops (see, e.g., Gisel, 1988; Le Révérend et al., 2014; Wilson & Green, 2009). Concurrent medical issues may affect this timeline. Foods given during the assessment should be consistent with the child’s current level of chewing skills.
A clinical evaluation of swallowing and feeding is the first step in determining the presence or absence of a swallowing disorder.
The evaluation may address
SLPs conduct assessments in a manner that is sensitive and responsive to the family’s cultural background, religious beliefs, dietary beliefs/practices/habits, history of disordered eating behaviors, and preferences for medical intervention. Families are encouraged to bring food and drink common to their household and utensils typically used by the child. Typical feeding practices and positioning should be used during assessment. Cultural, religious, and individual beliefs about food and eating practices may affect an individual’s comfort level or willingness to participate in the assessment. Some eating habits that appear to be a sign or symptom of a feeding disorder (e.g., avoiding certain foods or refusing to eat in front of others) may, in fact, be related to cultural differences in meal habits or may be symptoms of an eating disorder (National Eating Disorders Association, n.d.).
SLPs do not diagnose or treat eating disorders such as bulimia, anorexia, and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; in the cases where these disorders are suspected, the SLP should refer to the appropriate behavioral health professional.
The clinical evaluation typically begins with a case history based on a comprehensive review of medical/clinical records and interviews with the family and health care professionals.
Prior to bolus delivery, the SLP may assess the following:
A team approach is necessary for appropriately diagnosing and managing pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders, as the severity and complexity of these disorders vary widely in this population (McComish et al., 2016). The SLP who specializes in feeding and swallowing disorders typically leads the professional care team in the clinical or educational setting.
In addition to the SLP, team members may include
Additional medical and rehabilitation specialists may be included, depending on the type of facility, the professional expertise needed, and the specific population being served.
See ASHA’s resources on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP), and person- and family-centered care.
The clinical evaluation for infants from birth to 1 year of age—including those in the NICU—includes an evaluation of prefeeding skills, an assessment of readiness for oral feeding, an evaluation of breastfeeding and bottle-feeding ability, and observations of caregivers feeding the child.
SLPs should have extensive knowledge of
Appropriate referrals to medical professionals should be made when anatomical or physiological abnormalities are found during the clinical evaluation. The clinical evaluation of infants typically involves
Protocols for determining readiness for oral feeding and specific criteria for initiating feeding vary across facilities. Feeding readiness in NICUs may be a unilateral decision on the part of the neonatologist or a collaborative process involving the SLP, neonatologist, and nursing staff.
Key criteria to determine readiness for oral feeding include
Decisions regarding the initiation of oral feeding are based on recommendations from the medical and therapeutic team, with input from the parent and caregivers.
NNS is sucking for comfort without fluid release (e.g., with a pacifier, finger, or recently emptied breast). NNS does not determine readiness to orally feed, but it is helpful for assessment. NNS patterns can typically be evaluated with skilled observation and without the use of instrumental assessment.
A non-instrumental assessment of NNS includes an evaluation of the following:
The clinician can determine the appropriateness of NS following an NNS assessment. Any loss of stability in physiologic, motoric, or behavioral state from baseline should be taken into consideration at the time of the assessment.
NS skills are assessed during breastfeeding and bottle-feeding if both modes are going to be used. SLPs should be sensitive to family values, beliefs, and access regarding bottle-feeding and breastfeeding and should consult with parents and collaborate with nurses, lactation consultants, and other medical professionals to help identify parent preferences.
Assessment of NS includes an evaluation of the following:
The infant’s communication behaviors during feeding can be used to guide a flexible assessment. These cues can communicate the infant’s ability to tolerate bolus size, the need for more postural support, and if swallowing and breathing are no longer synchronized. In turn, the caregiver can use these cues to optimize feeding by responding to the infant’s needs in a dynamic fashion at any given moment (Shaker, 2013b).
SLPs collaborate with mothers, nurses, and lactation consultants prior to assessing breastfeeding skills. This requires a working knowledge of breastfeeding strategies to facilitate safe and efficient swallowing and optimal nutrition.
In addition to the clinical evaluation of infants noted above, breastfeeding assessment typically includes an evaluation of the
For an example, see community management of uncomplicated acute malnutrition in infants < 6 months of age (C-MAMI) [PDF].
The assessment of bottle-feeding includes an evaluation of the
The assessment of spoon-feeding includes an evaluation of the optimal spoon type and the infant’s ability to
In addition to the areas of assessment noted above, the evaluation for toddlers (ages 1–3 years) and preschool/school-age children (ages 3–21 years) may include
Evaluation in the school setting includes children/adults from 3 to 21 years of age. The school-based SLP and the school team (OT, PT, and school nurse) conduct the evaluation, which includes observation of the student eating a typical meal or snack. Implementation of strategies and modifications is part of the diagnostic process. Additional components of the evaluation include
The evaluation process begins with a referral to a team of professionals within the school district who are trained in the identification and treatment of feeding and swallowing disorders. The referral can be initiated by families/caregivers or school personnel.
The process of identifying the feeding and swallowing needs of students includes a review of the referral, interviews with the family/caregiver and teacher, and an observation of students during snack time or mealtime. A physician’s order to evaluate is typically not required in the school setting; however, it is best practice to collaborate with the student’s physician, particularly if the student is medically fragile or under the care of a physician.
The school SLP (or case manager) contacts the family to obtain consent for an evaluation if further evaluation is deemed necessary. They also discuss the evaluation process and gather information about the child’s medical and health history as well as their eating habits and typical diet at home.
The school SLP (or case manager) contacts the family to notify them of the school team’s concerns. At that time, they
The school-based feeding and swallowing team consists of parents and professionals within the school as well as professionals outside the school (e.g., physicians, dietitians, and psychologists). Members of the team include, but are not limited to, the following:
The team works together to
If the school team determines that a medical assessment, such as a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), sometimes also called fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, or other medical assessment, is required during the student’s program, the team works with the family to seek medical consultation or referral. A written referral or order from the treating physician is required for instrumental evaluations such as VFSS or FEES.
Best practice indicates establishing open lines of communication with the student’s physician or other health care provider—either through the family or directly—with the family’s permission. Any communication by the school team to an outside physician, facility, or individual requires signed parental consent.
In the school setting a physician’s order or prescription is not required to perform clinical evaluations, modify diets, or to provide intervention. However, there are times when a prescription, referral, or medical clearance from the student’s primary care physician or other health care provider is indicated, such as when the student
See ASHA’s resources on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) and collaboration and teaming for guidance on successful collaborative service delivery across settings.
See the treatment in the school setting section below for further information.
Instrumental evaluation is conducted following a clinical evaluation when further information is needed to determine the nature of the swallowing disorder. Instrumental assessments can help provide specific information about anatomy and physiology otherwise not accessible by noninstrumental evaluation. Instrumental evaluation can also help determine if swallow safety can be improved by modifying food textures, liquid consistencies, and positioning or implementing strategies.
Instrumental evaluation is completed in a medical setting. These studies are a team effort and may include the radiologist, radiology technician, and SLP. The SLP or radiology technician typically prepares and presents the barium items, whereas the radiologist records the swallow for visualization and analysis. Please see AHSA’s resource on state instrumental assessment requirements for further details.
The two most commonly used instrumental evaluations of swallowing for the pediatric population are
During an instrumental assessment of swallowing, the clinician may use information from cardiac, respiratory, and oxygen saturation monitors to monitor any changes to the physiologic or behavioral condition. Other signs to monitor include color changes, nasal flaring, and suck/swallow/breathe patterns.
The roles of the SLP in the instrumental evaluation of swallowing and feeding disorders include
Determining the appropriate procedure to use depends on what needs to be visualized and which procedure will be best tolerated by the child. Prior to the instrumental evaluation, clinicians are encouraged to collaborate with the medical team regarding feeding schedules that will maximize feeding readiness during the evaluation.
The VFSS may be appropriate for a child who is currently NPO or has never eaten by mouth to determine whether the child has a functional swallow and which types of food they can manage. The decision to use a VFSS is made with consideration for the child’s responsiveness (e.g., acceptance of oral stimulation or tastes on the lips without signs of distress) and the potential for medical complications. Careful pulmonary monitoring during a modified barium swallow is essential to help determine the child’s endurance over a typical mealtime.
When conducting an instrumental evaluation, SLPs should consider the following:
Procedures take place in a child-friendly environment with toys, visual distracters, rewards, and a familiar caregiver, if possible and when appropriate. Various items are available in the room to facilitate success and replicate a typical mealtime experience, including preferred foods, familiar food containers, utensil options, and seating options.
If the child is NPO, the clinician allows time for the child to develop the ability to accept and swallow a bolus. For children who have difficulty participating in the procedure, the clinician should allow time to control problem behaviors prior to initiating the instrumental procedure.
See the Treatment section of the Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
The primary goals of feeding and swallowing intervention for children are to
Consistent with the WHO’s (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework, goals are designed to
See Person-Centered Focus on Function: Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing [PDF] for examples of goals consistent with the ICF framework.
Medical, surgical, and nutritional factors are important considerations in treatment planning. Underlying disease state(s), chronological and developmental age of the child, social and environmental factors, and psychological and behavioral factors also affect treatment recommendations.
For children with complex feeding problems, an interdisciplinary team approach is essential for individualized treatment (McComish et al., 2016). See ASHA’s resources on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP), and collaboration and teaming.
Questions to ask when developing an appropriate treatment plan within the ICF framework include the following.
Can the child eat and drink safely?
Consider the child’s pulmonary status, nutritional status, overall medical condition, mobility, swallowing abilities, and cognition, in addition to the child’s swallowing function and how these factors affect feeding efficiency and safety.
Can the child receive adequate nutrition and hydration by mouth alone, given length of time to eat, efficiency, and fatigue factors?
This question is answered by the child’s medical team. If the child cannot meet nutritional needs by mouth, what recommendations need to be made concerning supplemental non-oral intake and/or the inclusion of orally fed supplements in the child’s diet? The team may consider the tube-feeding schedule, type of pump, rate, calories, and so forth.
How can the child’s functional abilities be maximized?
This might involve decisions about whether the individual can safely eat an oral diet that meets nutritional needs, whether that diet needs to be modified in any way, and whether the individual needs compensatory strategies to eat the diet. Does the child have the potential to improve swallowing function with direct treatment?
How can the child’s quality of life be preserved and/or enhanced?
Consider how long it takes to eat a meal, fear of eating, pleasure obtained from eating, social interactions while eating, and so on (Huckabee & Pelletier, 1999). The family’s customs and traditions around mealtimes and food should be respected and explored.
Are there behavioral and sensory motor issues that interfere with feeding and swallowing?
Do these behaviors result in family/caregiver frustration or increased conflict during meals? Is a sensory motor–based intervention for behavioral issues indicated?
The health and well-being of the child is the primary concern in treating pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders. Families may have strong beliefs about the medicinal value of some foods or liquids. Such beliefs and holistic healing practices may not be consistent with recommendations made. If certain practices are contraindicated, the clinician can work with the family to determine alternatives that allow the child to safely participate as fully as possible.
Treatment selection will depend on the child’s age, cognitive and physical abilities, and specific swallowing and feeding problems. Keep in mind that infants and young children with feeding and swallowing disorders, as well as some older children with concomitant intellectual disabilities, often need intervention techniques that do not require them to follow simple verbal or nonverbal instructions. In these cases, intervention might consist of changes in the environment or indirect treatment approaches for improving safety and efficiency of feeding.
Postural and positioning techniques involve adjusting the child’s posture or position to establish central alignment and stability for safe feeding. These techniques serve to protect the airway and offer safer transit of food and liquid. No single posture will provide improvement to all individuals. Postural changes differ between infants and older children.
Diet modifications consist of altering the viscosity, texture, temperature, portion size, or taste of a food or liquid to facilitate safety and ease of swallowing. Typical modifications may include thickening thin liquids, softening, cutting/chopping, or pureeing solid foods. Taste or temperature of a food may be altered to provide additional sensory input for swallowing. See International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI).
Diet modifications incorporate individual and family preferences, to the extent feasible. Consult with families regarding safety of medical treatments, such as swallowing medication in liquid or pill form, which may be contraindicated by the disorder. Diet modifications should consider the nutritional needs of the child to avoid undernutrition and malnutrition.
Consumers should use caution regarding the use of commercial, gum-based thickeners for infants of any age (Beal et al., 2012; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2017). Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) should be aware of these precautions and consult, as appropriate, with their facility to develop guidelines for using thickened liquids with infants.
Adaptive equipment and utensils may be used with children who have feeding problems to foster independence with eating and increase swallow safety by controlling bolus size or achieving the optimal flow rate of liquids.
Examples of adaptive equipment include
SLPs work with oral and pharyngeal implications of adaptive equipment. SLPs may collaborate with occupational therapists, considering that motor control for the use of this adaptive equipment is critical.
Maneuvers are strategies used to change the timing or strength of movements of swallowing (Logemann, 2000). Some maneuvers require following multistep directions and may not be appropriate for young children and/or older children with cognitive impairments. Please see the Treatment section of ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Adult Dysphagia for further information. Examples of maneuvers include the following:
Although sometimes referred to as the Masako maneuver, the Masako (or tongue-hold) is considered an exercise, not a maneuver. In the Masako, the tongue is held forward between the teeth while swallowing; this is performed without food or liquid in the mouth to prevent coughing or choking.
Postural/position techniques redirect the movement of the bolus in the oral cavity and pharynx and modify pharyngeal dimensions. These techniques may be used prior to or during the swallow. Examples include the following:
Please see the Treatment section of ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Adult Dysphagia for further information.
Oral–motor treatments include stimulation to—or actions of—the lips, jaw, tongue, soft palate, pharynx, larynx, and respiratory muscles. Oral–motor treatments range from passive (e.g., tapping, stroking, and vibration) to active (e.g., range-of-motion activities, resistance exercises, or chewing and swallowing exercises). Oral–motor treatments are intended to influence the physiologic underpinnings of the oropharyngeal mechanism to improve its functions. Some of these interventions can also incorporate sensory stimulation. Please visit ASHA’s Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing Evidence Map for further information.
Pacing—moderating the rate of intake by controlling or titrating the rate of presentation of food or liquid and the time between bites or swallows. Feeding strategies for children may include alternating bites of food with sips of liquid or swallowing 2–3 times per bite or sip. For infants, pacing can be accomplished by limiting the number of consecutive sucks. Strategies that slow the feeding rate may allow for more time between swallows to clear the bolus and may support more timely breaths.
Cue-based feeding—relies on cues from the infant, such as lack of active sucking, passivity, pushing the nipple away, or a weak suck. These cues typically indicate that the infant is disengaging from feeding and communicating the need to stop. They also provide information about the infant’s physiologic stability, which underlies the coordination of breathing and swallowing, and they guide the caregiver to intervene to support safe feeding. When the quality of feeding takes priority over the quantity ingested, the infant can set the pace of feeding and have more opportunity to enjoy the experience of feeding. As a result, intake is improved (Shaker, 2013a).
Rather than setting a goal to empty the bottle, the feeding experience is viewed as a partnership with the infant. The SLP plays a critical role in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), supporting and educating parents and other caregivers to understand and respond accordingly to the infant’s communication during feeding. Most NICUs have begun to move away from volume-driven feeding to cue-based feeding (Shaker, 2013a).
Responsive feeding—Like cue-based feeding, responsive feeding focuses on the caregiver-and-child dynamic. Responsive feeders attempt to understand and read a child’s cues for both hunger and satiety and respect those communication signals in infants, toddlers, and older children. Responsive feeding emphasizes communication rather than volume and may be used with infants, toddlers, and older children, unlike cue-based feeding that focuses on infants.
Sensory stimulation techniques vary and may include thermal–tactile stimulation (e.g., using an iced lemon glycerin swab) or tactile stimulation (e.g., using a NUK™ brush) applied to the tongue or around the mouth. Children who demonstrate aversive responses to stimulation may need approaches that reduce the level of sensory input initially, with incremental increases as the child demonstrates tolerance. Sensory stimulation may be needed for children with reduced responses, overactive responses, or limited opportunities for sensory experiences.
Behavioral interventions are based on principles of behavioral modification and focus on increasing appropriate actions or behaviors—including increasing compliance—and reducing maladaptive behaviors related to feeding. Behavioral interventions include such techniques as antecedent manipulation, shaping, prompting, modeling, stimulus fading, and differential reinforcement of alternate behavior, as well as implementation of basic mealtime principles (e.g., scheduled mealtimes in a neutral atmosphere with no food rewards).
Biofeedback includes instrumental methods (e.g., surface electromyography, ultrasound, nasendoscopy) that provide visual feedback during feeding and swallowing. Children with sufficient cognitive skills can be taught to interpret this visual information and make physiological changes during the swallowing process.
Electrical stimulation uses an electrical current to stimulate the peripheral nerve. SLPs with appropriate training and competence in performing electrical stimulation may provide the intervention. ASHA does not require any additional certifications to perform E-stim and urges members to follow the ASHA Code of Ethics, Principle II, Rule A which states: "Individuals who hold the Certificate of Clinical Competence shall engage in only those aspects of the professions that are within the scope of their professional practice and competence, considering their certification status, education, training, and experience" (ASHA, 2023).
If choosing to use electrical stimulation in the pediatric population, the primary focus should be on careful patient selection to ensure that electrical stimulation is being used only in situations where there is no possibility of inducing untoward effects. ASHA is strongly committed to evidence-based practice and urges members to consider the best available evidence before utilizing any product or technique. ASHA does not endorse any products, procedures, or programs, and therefore does not have an official position on the use of electrical stimulation or specific workshops or products associated with electrical stimulation.
Intraoral prosthetics (e.g., palatal obturator, palatal lift prosthesis) can be used to normalize the intraoral cavity by providing compensation or physical support for children with congenital abnormalities (e.g., cleft palate) or damage to the oropharyngeal mechanism. With this support, swallowing efficiency and function may be improved.
Intraoral appliances (e.g., palatal plates) are removable devices with small knobs that provide tactile stimulation inside the mouth to encourage lip closure and appropriate lip and tongue position for improved functional feeding skills. Intraoral appliances are not commonly used.
Referrals may be made to dental professionals for assessment and fitting of these devices.
Tube feeding includes alternative avenues of intake such as via a nasogastric tube, a transpyloric tube (placed in the duodenum or jejunum), or a gastrostomy tube (a gastronomy tube placed in the stomach or a gastronomy–jejunostomy tube placed in the jejunum). Alternative feeding does not preclude the need for feeding-related treatment. These approaches may be considered by the medical team if the child’s swallowing safety and efficiency cannot reach a level of adequate function or does not adequately support nutrition and hydration. In these instances, the swallowing and feeding team will
Please see ASHA’s resource on alternative nutrition and hydration in dysphagia care for further information.
Clinicians working in the NICU should be aware of the multidisciplinary nature of this practice area, the variables that influence infant feeding, and the process for developing appropriate treatment plans in this setting. The NICU is considered an advanced practice area, and inexperienced SLPs should be aware that additional training and competencies may be necessary.
In all cases, the SLP must have an accurate understanding of the physiologic mechanism behind the feeding problems seen in this population. This understanding gives the SLP the necessary knowledge to choose appropriate treatment interventions and provide rationale for their use in the NICU.
In their role as communication specialists, SLPs monitor the infant for stress cues and teach parents and other caregivers to recognize and interpret the infant’s communication signals. SLPs treating preterm and medically fragile infants must be well versed in typical infant behavior and development so that they can recognize and interpret changes in behavior. These changes can provide cues that signal well-being or stress during feeding.
Behaviors can include changes in the following:
Readiness for oral feeding in the preterm or acutely ill, full-term infant is associated with
Supportive interventions to facilitate early feeding and/or to promote readiness for feeding include kangaroo mother care (KMC), non-nutritive sucking (NNS), oral administration of maternal milk, feeding protocols, and positioning (e.g., swaddling).
It is important to consult with the physician to determine when to begin oral feeding for children who have been NPO for an extended time frame. It is also important to consider any behavioral and/or sensory components that may influence feeding when exploring the option to begin oral feeding.
KMC—skin-to-skin contact between a mother and her newborn infant—can be an important factor in helping the infant achieve readiness for oral feeding, particularly breastfeeding. Other benefits of KMC include temperature regulation, promotion of breastfeeding, parental empowerment and bonding, stimulation of lactation, and oral stimulation for the promotion of oral feeding ability.
NNS involves allowing an infant to suck without taking milk, either at the breast (after milk has been expressed) or with the use of a pacifier. It is used as a treatment option to encourage eventual oral intake. The SLP providing and facilitating oral experiences with NNS must take great care to ensure that the experiences are positive and do not elicit stress or other negative consequences. The SLP also teaches parents and other caregivers to provide positive oral experiences and to recognize and interpret the infant’s cues during NNS.
Administration of small amounts of maternal milk into the oral cavity of enteral tube–dependent infants improves breastfeeding rates, growth, and immune-protective factors and reduces sepsis (Pados & Fuller, 2020). It may also improve the timing of oral feeding initiation (Simpson et al., 2002), increase rates of “majority breastmilk” enteral feeds compared to those who receive tube feeding of formula alone (Snyder et al., 2017), and allow for earlier attainment of full enteral feedings (Rodriguez & Caplan, 2015).
Feeding protocols include those that consider infant cues (i.e., responsive feeding) and those that are based on a schedule (i.e., scheduled feeding).
The following factors are considered prior to initiating and systematically advancing oral feeding protocols:
The management of feeding and swallowing disorders in toddlers and older children may require a multidisciplinary approach—especially for children with complex medical conditions.
Similar to treatment for infants in the NICU, treatment for toddlers and older children takes a number of factors into consideration, including the following:
Management of students with feeding and swallowing disorders in the schools addresses the impact of the disorder on the student’s educational performance and promotes the student’s safe swallow in order to avoid choking and/or aspiration pneumonia. Students with recurrent pneumonia may miss numerous school days, which has a direct impact on their ability to access the educational curriculum.
Information from the referral, parent interview/case history, and clinical evaluation of the student is used to develop IEP goals and objectives for improved feeding and swallowing, if appropriate.
A feeding and swallowing plan addresses diet and environmental modifications and procedures to minimize aspiration risk and optimize nutrition and hydration. Ongoing staff and family education is essential to student safety. The plan should be reviewed annually along with the IEP goals and objectives or as needed if significant changes occur or if it is found to be ineffective.
A feeding and swallowing plan may include but not be limited to
An individualized health plan or individualized health care plan may be developed as part of the IEP or 504 plan to establish appropriate health care that may be needed for students with feeding and/or swallowing disorder. The plan includes a protocol for response in the event of a student health emergency (Homer, 2008). Staff who work closely with the student should have training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the Heimlich maneuver.
Feeding and swallowing challenges can persist well into adolescence and adulthood. Precautions, accommodations, and adaptations must be considered and implemented as students transition to postsecondary settings. See ASHA’s resource on transitioning youth for information about transition planning.
Periodic assessment and monitoring of significant changes are necessary to ensure ongoing swallow safety and adequate nutrition throughout adulthood. A risk assessment for choking and an assessment of nutritional status should be considered part of a routine examination for adults with disabilities, particularly those with a history of feeding and swallowing problems. See, for example, Moreno-Villares (2014) and Thacker et al. (2008).
See the Service Delivery section of the Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing Evidence Map for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective.
In addition to determining the type of treatment that is optimal for the child with feeding and swallowing problems, SLPs consider other service delivery variables that may affect treatment outcomes, including format, provider, dosage, and setting. Decisions are made based on the child’s needs, their family’s views and preferences, and the setting where services are provided.
Format refers to the structure of the treatment session (e.g., group and/or individual). The appropriateness of the treatment format often depends on the child’s age, the type and severity of the feeding or swallowing problem, and the service delivery setting.
Provider refers to the person providing treatment (e.g., SLP, occupational therapist, or other feeding specialist). Recommended practices follow a collaborative process that involves an interdisciplinary team, including the child, family, caregivers, and other related professionals. When treatment incorporates accommodations, modifications, and supports in everyday settings, SLPs often provide training and education in how to use strategies to facilitate safe swallowing.
Dosage refers to the frequency, intensity, and duration of service. Dosage depends on individual factors, including the child’s medical status, nutritional needs, and readiness for oral intake.
Setting refers to the location of treatment and varies across the continuum of care (e.g., NICU, intensive care unit, inpatient acute care, outpatient clinic, home, or school).
This list of resources is not exhaustive, and the inclusion of any specific resource does not imply endorsement from ASHA.
American Psychiatric Association. (2016). Feeding and eating disorders: DSM-5 Selections.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics [Ethics]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
Arvedson, J. C. (2008). Assessment of pediatric dysphagia and feeding disorders: Clinical and instrumental approaches. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 14(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.17
Arvedson, J. C., & Brodsky, L. (2002). Pediatric swallowing and feeding: Assessment and management. Singular.
Arvedson, J. C., & Lefton-Greif, M. A. (1998). Pediatric videofluoroscopic swallow studies: A professional manual with caregiver guidelines. Communication Skill Builders.
Beal, J., Silverman, B., Bellant, J., Young, T. E., & Klontz, K. (2012). Late onset necrotizing enterocolitis in infants following use of a xanthan gum-containing thickening agent. The Journal of Pediatrics, 161(2), 354–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.054
Beckett, C., Bredenkamp, D., Castle, J., Groothues, C., O’Connor, T. G., Rutter, M., & the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. (2002). Behavior patterns associated with institutional deprivation: A study of children adopted from Romania. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 23(5), 297–303.
Benfer, K. A., Weir, K. A., Bell, K. L., Ware, R. S., Davies, P. S. W., & Boyd, R. N. (2014). Oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy: Oral phase impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(12), 3469–3481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.029
Benfer, K. A., Weir, K. A., Bell, K. L., Ware, R. S., Davies, P. S. W., & Boyd, R. N. (2017). Oropharyngeal dysphagia and cerebral palsy. Pediatrics, 140(6), e20170731. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0731
Bhattacharyya, N. (2015). The prevalence of pediatric voice and swallowing problems in the United States. The Laryngoscope, 125(3), 746–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24931
Black, L. I., Vahratian, A., & Hoffman, H. J. (2015). Communication disorders and use of intervention services among children aged 3–17 years: United States, 2012 [NCHS Data Brief No. 205]. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db205.htm
Brackett, K., Arvedson, J. C., & Manno, C. J. (2006). Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders: General assessment and intervention. SIG 13 Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia), 15(3), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd15.3.10
Calis, E. A. C., Veuglers, R., Sheppard, J. J., Tibboel, D., Evenhuis, H. M., & Penning, C. (2008). Dysphagia in children with severe generalized cerebral palsy and intellectual disability. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50(8), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03047.x
Caron, C. J. J. M., Pluijmers, B. I., Joosten, K. F. M., Mathijssen, I. M. J., van der Schroeff, M. P., Dunaway, D. J., Wolvius, E. B., & Koudstaal, M. J. (2015). Feeding difficulties in craniofacial microsomia: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(6), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.014
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/index.htm
Davis-McFarland, E. (2008). Family and cultural issues in a school swallowing and feeding program. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/020)
de Vries, I. A. C., Breugem, C. C., van der Heul, A. M. B., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Kon, M., & Mink van der Molen, A. B. (2014). Prevalence of feeding disorders in children with cleft palate only: A retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 18(5), 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1117-x
Eddy, K. T., Thomas, J. J., Hastings, E., Edkins, K., Lamont, E., Nevins, C. M., Patterson, R. M., Murray, H. B., Bryant-Waugh, R., & Becker, A. E. (2015). Prevalence of DSM-5 avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric gastroenterology healthcare network. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(5), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22350
Erkin, G., Culha, C., Ozel, S., & Kirbiyik, E. G. (2010). Feeding and gastrointestinal problems in children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 33(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283375e10
Fisher, M. M., Rosen, D. S., Ornstein, R. M., Mammel, K. A., Katzman, D. K., Rome, E. S., Callahan, S. T., Malizio, J., Kearney, S., & Walsh, B. T. (2014). Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents: A “new disorder” in DSM-5. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.013
Francis, D. O., Krishnaswami, S., & McPheeters, M. (2015). Treatment of ankyloglossia and breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 135(6), e1458–e1466. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0658
Geyer, L. A., McGowan, J. S. (1995). Positioning infants and children for videofluroscopic swallowing function studies. Infants and Young Children, 8(2), 58-64.
Gisel, E. G. (1988). Chewing cycles in 2- to 8-year-old normal children: A developmental profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.42.1.40
Homer, E. (2008). Establishing a public school dysphagia program: A model for administration and service provision. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/018)
Huckabee, M. L., & Pelletier, C. A. (1999). Management of adult neurogenic dysphagia. Singular.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/
Jaffal, H., Isaac, A., Johannsen, W., Campbell, S., & El-Hakim, H. G. (2020). The prevalence of swallowing dysfunction in children with laryngomalacia: A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 139, 110464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110464
Johnson, D. E., & Dole, K. (1999). International adoptions: Implications for early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 11(4), 34–45.
Le Révérend, B. J. D., Edelson, L. R., & Loret, C. (2014). Anatomical, functional, physiological and behavioural aspects of the development of mastication in early childhood. British Journal of Nutrition, 111(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513002699
Lefton-Greif, M. A. (2008). Pediatric dysphagia. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 19(4), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2008.05.007
Lefton-Greif, M. A., Carroll, J. L., & Loughlin, G. M. (2006). Long-term follow-up of oropharyngeal dysphagia in children without apparent risk factors. Pediatric Pulmonology, 41(11), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20488
Lefton-Greif, M. A., McGrattan, K. E., Carson, K. A., Pinto, J. M., Wright, J. M., & Martin-Harris, B. (2017). First steps towards development of an instrument for the reproducible quantification of oropharyngeal swallow physiology in bottle-fed children. Dysphagia, 33(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9834-y
Logemann, J. A. (1998). Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. Pro-Ed.
Logemann, J. A. (2000). Therapy for children with swallowing disorders in the educational setting. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3101.50
Mandich, M. B., Ritchie, S. K., & Mullett, M. (1996). Transition times to oral feeding in premature infants with and without apnea. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 25(9), 771–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1996.tb01493.x
Manikam, R., & Perman, J. A. (2000). Pediatric feeding disorders. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 30(1), 34–46.
McCain, G. C. (1997). Behavioral state activity during nipple feedings for preterm infants. Neonatal Network, 16(5), 43–47.
McComish, C., Brackett, K., Kelly, M., Hall, C., Wallace, S., & Powell, V. (2016). Interdisciplinary feeding team: A medical, motor, behavioral approach to complex pediatric feeding problems. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 41(4), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000252
Meal Requirements for Lunches and Requirements for Afterschool Snacks, 7 C.F.R. § 210.10(m)(1) (2021). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-7/subtitle-B/chapter-II/subchapter-A/part-210/subpart-C/section-210.10
Moreno-Villares, J. M. (2014). La transición a cuidado adulto para niños con desórdenes neurológicos crónicos: ¿Cual es la mejor manera de hacerlo? [Transition to adult care for children with chronic neurological disorders: Which is the best way to make it?]. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 29(Suppl. 2), 32–37.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2010). Number of all-listed diagnoses for sick newborn infants by sex and selected diagnostic categories [Data file]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/8newsborns/2010new8_numbersick.pdf [PDF]
National Eating Disorders Association. (n.d.). Warning signs and symptoms. https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/warning-signs-and-symptoms
Newman, L. A., Keckley, C., Petersen, M. C., & Hamner, A. (2001). Swallowing function and medical diagnoses in infants suspected of dysphagia. Pediatrics, 108(6), e106. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.6.e106
Norris, M. L., Spettigue, W. J., & Katzman, D. K. (2016). Update on eating disorders: Current perspectives on avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and youth. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S82538
Pados, B. F., & Fuller, K. (2020). Establishing a foundation for optimal feeding outcomes in the NICU. Nursing for Women’s Health, 24(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2020.03.007
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. https://www.ada.gov/regs2016/504_nprm.html
Reid, J., Kilpatrick, N., & Reilly, S. (2006). A prospective, longitudinal study of feeding skills in a cohort of babies with cleft conditions. The Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal, 43(6), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1597/05-172
Rodriguez, N. A., & Caplan, M. S. (2015). Oropharyngeal administration of mother’s milk to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low-birth-weight infants. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 29(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000082
Seiverling, L., Towle, P., Hendy, H. M., & Pantelides, J. (2018). Prevalence of feeding problems in young children with and without autism spectrum disorder: A chart review study. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118789396
Shaker, C. S. (2013a). Cue-based feeding in the NICU: Using the infant’s communication as a guide. Neonatal Network, 32(6), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0822.214.171.1244
Shaker, C. S. (2013b, February 1). Reading the feeding. The ASHA Leader, 18(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTRI.18022013.42
Sharp, W. G., Berry, R. C., McCracken, C., Nuhu, N. N., Marvel, E., Saulnier, C. A., Klin, A., Jones, W., & Jaquess, D. L. (2013). Feeding problems and nutrient intake in children with autism disorders: A meta-analysis and comprehensive review of the literature. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1771-5
Simpson, C., Schanler, R. J., & Lau, C. (2002). Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics, 110(3), 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.3.517
Snyder, R., Herdt, A., Mejias-Cepeda, N., Ladino, J., Crowley, K., & Levy, P. (2017). Early provision of oropharyngeal colostrum leads to sustained breast milk feedings in preterm infants. Pediatrics & Neonatology, 58(6), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.04.003
Speyer, R., Cordier, R., Kim, J.-H., Cocks, N., Michou, E., & Wilkes-Gillan, S. (2019). Prevalence of drooling, swallowing, and feeding problems in cerebral palsy across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 61(11), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14316
Thacker, A., Abdelnoor, A., Anderson, C., White, S., & Hollins, S. (2008). Indicators of choking risk in adults with learning disabilities: A questionnaire survey and interview study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(15), 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701461625
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2017). Accommodating children with disabilities in the school meal programs: Guidance for school food service professionals. https://www.fns.usda.gov/cn/2017-edition-accommodating-children-disabilities-school-meal-programs
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017). FDA expands caution about Simply Thick. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170722060115/https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm256250.htm
Velayutham, P., Irace, A. L., Kawai, K., Dodrill, P., Perez, J., Londahl, M., Mundy, L., Dombrowski, N. D., & Rahbar, R. (2018). Silent aspiration: Who is at risk? The Laryngoscope, 128(8), 1952–1957. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27070
Webb, A. N., Hao, W., & Hong, P. (2013). The effect of tongue-tie division on breastfeeding and speech articulation: A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77(5), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.008
Wilson, E. M., & Green, J. R. (2009). The development of jaw motion for mastication. Early Human Development, 85(5), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.12.003
Content for ASHA's Practice Portal is developed through a comprehensive process that includes multiple rounds of subject matter expert input and review. ASHA extends its gratitude to the following subject matter experts who were involved in the development of the Pediatric Dysphagia page:
In addition, ASHA thanks the members of the Ad Hoc Committee on Speech-Language Pathology Practice in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU); Special Interest Division 13, Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) Committee on Cross-Training; and the Working Group on Dysphagia in Schools, whose work was foundational to the development of this content.
Members of the Ad Hoc Committee on Speech-Language Pathology Practice in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit included Justine J. Sheppard (chair), Joan C. Arvedson, Alexandra Heinsen-Combs, Lemmietta G. McNeilly, Susan M. Moore, Meri S. Rosenzweig Ziev, and Diane R. Paul (ex officio). Alex F. Johnson and Celia Hooper served as monitoring officers (vice presidents for speech-language pathology practices, 2000–2002 and 2003–2005, respectively).
Members of the Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) Committee on Cross-Training included Caryn Easterling, Maureen Lefton-Greif, Paula Sullivan, Nancy Swigert, and Janet Brown (ASHA staff liaison). Celia Hooper, vice president for professional practices in speech-language pathology (2003–2005), served as monitoring vice president.
Members of the Working Group on Dysphagia in Schools included Emily M. Homer (chair), Sheryl C. Amaral, Joan C. Arvedson, Randy M. Kurjan, Cynthia R. O'Donoghue, Justine Joan Sheppard, and Janet E. Brown (ASHA liaison). Brian B. Shulman, vice president for professional practices in speech-language pathology, served as the monitoring officer.
The recommended citation for this Practice Portal page is:
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d). Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing. (Practice Portal). Retrieved month, day, year, from www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/pediatric-dysphagia/.