The scope of this page is hearing aids for children aged birth to 18 years.
See the Hearing Loss (Newborn) Evidence Map, the Hearing Loss (Early Childhood) Evidence Map, and the Hearing Loss (School-Age) Evidence Map for summaries of the available research on this topic. Hearing-related terminology may vary depending upon context and a range of factors. See the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) resource on hearing-related topics: terminology guidance for more information.
A hearing aid is an electronic device that is worn in the ear, behind the ear, or on the skull that amplifies sound for use by individuals with hearing loss. A hearing aid may be included as one part of a comprehensive audiologic (re)habilitation plan for a child who is deaf or hard of hearing. A child’s plan of care is developed with input and collaboration from the family, the child, and an interprofessional team. Depending on the child’s needs, team members will vary. See the ASHA resource on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) for more information on the role of audiologists and speech-language pathologists in team collaboration.
The child and the child’s family are a significant part of the care team. Children may be highly dependent on their family and extended support system to assist in the adjustment to amplification, monitor progress, and provide feedback to the audiologist and care team on goals and outcomes. Family-centered practice is crucial when providing services to children who are deaf and hard of hearing, including those who use hearing aids. An international panel of experts has described the guiding principles of family-centered early intervention for children who are deaf and hard of hearing, which include partnership between families and professionals, informed decision making, and access to support services (Moeller et al., 2013). For more information, see the ASHA resources on person- and family-centered care, person-centered care in audiology, and health literacy. Related pages are available from Boys Town National Research Hospital (babyhearing.org), the Ida Institute, and the National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM).
Hearing aids are considered medical devices and, as such, are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
For further information related to pediatric audiology services, see the ASHA Practice Portal pages on Classroom Acoustics, Cochlear Implants, Cultural Responsiveness, Early Intervention, and Hearing Loss in Children.
The incidence of a disorder or condition refers to the number of new cases identified in a specified time period. Prevalence refers to the number of individuals who are living with the disorder or condition in a given time period. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program data from 2019, the prevalence of hearing loss is 1.7 per 1,000 newborns screened. Although 61.7% of those infants are enrolled in early intervention services, there is no available estimate of how many children receive hearing aids. Data from the MarkeTrak IX survey of 17,000 households indicate that approximately 3% of children under the age of 18 years experience hearing difficulties and that approximately 1% have a hearing aid (Abrams & Kihm, 2015). The early identification of hearing loss has been shown to improve access to amplification devices. Within 5 years of enacting universal newborn hearing screening initiatives, 68% of children who had been identified with hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids by 6 months of age, up from 14% before the legislation was enacted (Halpin et al., 2010).
Audiologists play a central role in the screening, assessment, diagnosis, management, and treatment of children who are deaf and hard of hearing, including those who use hearing aids. The professional roles and activities in audiology include clinical and educational services (diagnosis, assessment, planning, counseling, and treatment); prevention and advocacy; and education, administration, and research. See ASHA's Scope of Practice in Audiology (ASHA, 2018).
Appropriate roles for audiologists include the following:
As indicated in the ASHA Code of Ethics (ASHA, 2016a), audiologists who serve this population should be specifically educated and appropriately trained to do so. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH, 2019) notes that “audiologic diagnosis of the infant is the sole purview of the audiologist with specific skills, knowledge, and access to all necessary equipment for infant and early childhood audiologic diagnostic evaluations” (p. 12).
SLPs play a role in the identification, screening, assessment, and (re)habilitation of children who are deaf and hard of hearing, including those who use hearing aids. Professional roles and activities in speech-language pathology include clinical and educational services; prevention and advocacy; and education, administration, and research. See ASHA's Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology (ASHA, 2016b).
Appropriate roles and responsibilities for SLPs include the following:
As indicated in the ASHA Code of Ethics (ASHA, 2016a), SLPs who serve this population should be specifically educated and appropriately trained to do so.
A child- and family-centered plan of care for a child using hearing aids will involve a team of professionals. The composition of an interprofessional team will vary based on the needs of the child and their family. These professionals may include, but not be limited to, the following:
For example, some children may have executive function needs, whereas others may have needs around the fine motor manipulation of hearing aids, and yet others may have sensory adjustment needs around promoting the consistent wearing and use of hearing aids. See the ASHA resource on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) for more information on this topic.
Counseling and education for a child who is deaf or hard of hearing and their family begins during the initial contact with an audiologist. Along with providing information on the overarching topics of hearing loss and amplification, the audiologist can offer guidance and support in the decision-making process of the child and family regarding potential hearing aid implementation, selection, and use. Counseling will continue throughout the entire hearing aid fitting (as appropriate and if selected) and follow-up process. Information, education, resources, and answers to questions should be provided in a manner that is understandable to the child and/or their family and in their heritage language. See the ASHA resource on health literacy for more information.
Topics and issues addressed through counseling may include
As a member of an interprofessional care team, the SLP also plays a key role in counseling the child and/or family regarding communication needs and the effects of hearing loss on child development. Referrals for formal counseling by a mental health provider (e.g., school counselor, psychologist) may also be indicated.
The Ida Institute offers tools specifically designed for counseling children and families (e.g., My Hearing Explained for Children). ASHA’s Patient Education Handouts—Audiology Information Series offers various handouts that may be helpful during child and family counseling activities. For more information on this topic, visit the ASHA Practice Portal pages on Counseling For Professional Service Delivery and Cultural Responsiveness.
See the Assessment section of the following evidence maps for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective: Hearing Loss (Newborn) Evidence Map, Hearing Loss (Early Childhood) Evidence Map, and Hearing Loss (School-Age) Evidence Map. For guidance and considerations on infection control practices during the assessment process, see the ASHA page on infection control resources for audiologists and speech-language pathologists.
Prior to the hearing-aid-fitting process, comprehensive assessment(s) are completed. A comprehensive assessment will determine the type, degree, and configuration of the hearing loss. It will describe the child’s current developmental functioning in comparison to their expected milestones, communication needs, and possible aural (re)habilitation needs. Potential candidacy for amplification will be established, and baseline measures for future monitoring will be obtained.
Components of a comprehensive assessment may include, but not be limited to,
A thorough case history may include, but not be limited to, the following:
An audiologic assessment of both ears is performed to determine the type, degree, and configuration of hearing loss and to gather information (specific to each ear) that is needed for the initiation of amplification device fitting. A comprehensive audiologic assessment will include otoscopy as well as a test battery individualized to the child (i.e., based on age and developmental screening). The test battery may include, but not be limited to, the following:
See the Assessment section of the ASHA Practice Portal page on Hearing Loss in Children for details on audiologic assessment components.
When a child under the age of 3 years is identified as having a hearing loss, a referral to the child’s state early intervention program is required as soon as possible and within 7 days of the identification (Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers With Disabilities, 2011). Children diagnosed in infancy should begin receiving early intervention services by 6 months of age (JCIH, 2019). For details on the latest JCIH position statement, see the JCIH website. The National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM) provides information on Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs in each state. More information is available on the ASHA Practice Portal pages on Early Intervention and Newborn Hearing Screening.
A speech-language assessment for a child who is deaf or hard of hearing is completed to obtain information regarding that child’s current communication and language status, to identify areas of concern for the child and/or family, to determine specific intervention needs, and to refer the child and their family to other appropriate professionals (e.g., medical, clinical, educational) in order to facilitate access to comprehensive services.
A comprehensive assessment will be guided by information provided by the child, the child’s family, teachers, and/or additional caregivers. The assessment may include formal and/or informal measures of speech, language, cognitive skills, executive function, social skills, auditory skills, speech perception, and functional listening skills. It will be completed with consideration to the child’s language(s) and communication modalities (e.g., spoken language, signed language, sign-supported spoken language, total communication, augmentative and alternative communication), the impact of any current hearing device and hearing assistive technology, and the child’s current developmental abilities.
Assessment may include, but not be limited to, the following:
Speech, language, auditory, and cognitive-communication skills are assessed on an ongoing basis and in a variety of settings, particularly when changes in hearing status, hearing aids, or hearing assistive technology occur. Any concerns about a change in a child’s hearing function or lack of auditory development warrant a referral back to an audiologist.
The timing and precipitating factors of the identification and reporting of a hearing loss or suspected hearing loss impact the establishment of a child’s medical home in relation to hearing health care. For example, a child may be identified through a newborn hearing screening program, a failed hearing screening at school, or parent concern. A pediatrician or a family physician may be the first medical professional involved in the child’s hearing health care. Referrals to an audiologist, an otolaryngologist, and other specialists (e.g., ophthalmologist, geneticist, neurologist) are based on the child’s specific needs, concerns, and/or signs and symptoms. Specialists can help determine the etiology of the hearing problems and identify related conditions. See the American Academy of Pediatrics Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Implementation Tip Sheet [PDF] for examples of tools (i.e., checklists, screening algorithms) to support medical home providers in monitoring a child’s hearing, making appropriate referrals, and collaborating with pediatric specialists—including audiologists and SLPs.
For an individual under 18 years of age, medical clearance must be obtained from a physician (preferably one who specializes in childhood hearing loss) prior to being fit with amplification (i.e., hearing aids). Medical clearance must occur within the 6 months prior to the hearing aid fitting per the Code of Federal Regulations (21 C.F.R. § 801.421; Hearing Aid Devices; Conditions for Sale, 2020). Neither the parents nor the child can waive this requirement. See the Code of Federal Regulations (21 C.F.R. § 801.420; Hearing Aid Devices; Professional and Patient Labeling, 2020) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s How to get Hearing Aids for more information on this topic.
A needs assessment is conducted, in part, to determine hearing aid candidacy and to develop child- and family-centered goals. Along with assessing the impact of a hearing loss on everyday listening situations, the needs assessment gathers information regarding each child’s unique circumstances. The needs assessment can help affirm the need for treatment, identify the need for additional referrals, and establish realistic expectations.
In addition to auditory and communication function, a variety of factors may impact an individual’s candidacy for, and choices regarding, hearing aids. Factors may be cultural, sociological, environmental, physical (e.g., craniofacial, visual, manual), and/or psychological.
A needs assessment for hearing aid candidacy may include various speech perception measures (e.g., speech awareness/reception threshold, Ling 6-Sound Test for detection, speech recognition). Speech perception measures can be administered without the use of a hearing aid at varying levels of stimuli complexity and in quiet and noise to establish a baseline prior to treatment. Calibrated and recorded stimuli are often used, when possible, because monitored live voice may under- or overpredict the child’s abilities.
An individual ear canal acoustics assessment (e.g., measure of the real-ear-to-coupler difference [RECD]) may be included to assist with determining a child’s unaided speech intelligibility index score and potential candidacy for hearing aids (McCreery et al., 2020).
Self-assessments can be used as measures of self-perceived communication needs, and the results may be helpful in establishing goals and expectations for amplification. When a child is too young to complete a self-assessment, similar questionnaires may be completed by a child’s parent, caregiver, or teacher. Results of self-assessments and/or parent and caregiver questionnaires are beneficial to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of any audiologic intervention program. Examples of tools that may be helpful to this process can be found at Ida Institute: Tools and at The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP) site.
When evaluating and fitting hearing aids for multilingual children, implications around the child’s phonetic inventory, phonology, and syntax should be considered. Using only English words to evaluate multilingual listeners may lead to faulty clinical impressions. Evaluating multilingual speakers in their primary or dominant language will give the most accurate picture of their speech recognition ability. Specific recommendations on how to program a hearing aid for many non-English languages have been offered (Chasin, 2011).
Some children who are deaf and hard of hearing use sign language as their primary language. Achieving spoken language may not be among their goals for amplification. Other goals, such as alerting to environmental sounds and improving personal safety, may be the priority when fitting hearing aids for these children. Collaboration with qualified sign language interpreters in appropriate situations is essential.
See the ASHA Practice Portal page on Collaborating With Interpreters, Transliterators, and Translators for more information.
See the Treatment section of the following evidence maps for pertinent scientific evidence, expert opinion, and client/caregiver perspective: Hearing Loss (Newborn) Evidence Map, Hearing Loss (Early Childhood) Evidence Map, and Hearing Loss (School-Age) Evidence Map. For guidance and considerations on infection control practices during the treatment process, see the ASHA page on infection control resources for audiologists and speech-language pathologists.
A child- and family-centered audiologic treatment plan will reflect the child’s individual needs, language and communication goals, and developmental level. Specific services may be influenced by the following:
The audiologist and/or SLP will provide comprehensive assessment results, findings, and recommendations to the child and/or family (as appropriate per age and developmental level) in a format that is understandable and that allows for full participation in joint decision making in all areas of the proposed treatment plan. See ASHA’s resource on health literacy for more information.
Hearing aid(s) may be recommended as one part of a larger management program. Treatment planning may include, but not be limited to, the following:
The World Health Organization (2001) published the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a classification of health and disability based upon functional status. This classification system can be used to assist clinicians in establishing goals and in determining specific outcomes that can be measured through client report.
See the ASHA page on International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) for more information.
Appropriate hearing aid device and feature selection is an ongoing process and can change as a child grows and as their listening needs evolve. A hearing aid is selected based on key information such as the following:
Examples of hearing aid types that may be selected for children include the following, with some types being more appropriate for older children and teenagers:
The following hearing aid features are important to consider when selecting a hearing aid for a child:
Once a hearing aid has been selected and received, the in-depth process of fitting, verification, and validation begins. The verification and validation processes ensure optimal use of the hearing aid so that the user can derive maximum benefit from the hearing aid and its features. It is beneficial for the child and family members to be highly involved and for the audiologist to continue offering education and counseling as appropriate (e.g., discussions of realistic expectations for progress with hearing aids).
When fitting hearing aids for children, speech audibility is a primary focus. The child’s age and listening behaviors impact the verification process, especially when considering the use of advanced features (McCreery, 2011).
Upon receipt of the device(s), the audiologist does a visual inspection, looking for any defects (e.g., cracks on the earmold). They also conduct a listening check to rule out excessive circuit noise and intermittency.
Prior to placing the hearing aid on the child’s ear, electroacoustic measurements should be performed according to ANSI S3.22-2014 (American National Standards Institute [ANSI], 2014, or the current standard) to determine whether the hearing aid meets its intended performance measures in the text box. Coupler measures of gain, frequency response, maximum output, distortion, and battery drain should conform to the manufacturer’s published specifications and prescriptive fitting algorithms appropriate for children. If the electroacoustic performance does not meet expected performance measures, replacement by the manufacturer is advised.
The audiologist determines the physical fit of the hearing aid and earmold (if applicable) by assessing physical comfort, absence of feedback, ease of insertion and removal, and security of fit. If needed, fit can be adjusted by remaking, altering, or exchanging the hearing aids and/or earmolds. Infants and young children grow quickly and require frequent replacement of their earmolds, as often as every 1–2 months during the first year of life. The audiologist also determines the need for any hearing aid retainers (e.g., hearing aid clips, specialty tape).
Desired Sensation Level (DSL) version 5.0 (Scollie et al., 2005; Seewald et al., 2005) and NAL-NL2 from the National Acoustic Laboratories (Keidser et al., 2011) are commonly used prescriptive fitting algorithms for children. Both prescriptions seek to optimize speech intelligibility while maintaining patient comfort with loudness level. The prescriptive formulas offer an initial starting point for the fitting process. Fine tuning may be required after the verification process to ensure optimal fit.
Real-ear measures are used to verify prescriptive fitting targets and various hearing aid features. The audiologist can measure the actual sound delivered by a distinct hearing aid to a specific child, thus allowing for an accurate fitting. Real-ear measurements are completed using probe tubes placed into the ear canals and can be done with or without the hearing aid in place. Real-ear measures have been described in detail by Mueller (2001). More information can also be found on the ASHA Practice Portal page on Hearing Aids For Adults.
Some older children can tolerate the completion of probe microphone measures with the use of prescriptive targets. For babies, younger children, and those who otherwise cannot tolerate probe microphone measurements, real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) measurement can be used to verify hearing aid benefit (McCreery, 2013; McCreery & Walker, 2017). To do this, the audiologist takes a probe microphone measure with just the child’s earmold or with an insert in the child’s ear. Once that information is collected, the hearing aid can then be tested in a separate test box and adjusted accordingly. See RECD Measurements for more information.
Other measurements and verifications may include the maximum output level of the hearing aid and the audibility of speech for various speech volume levels: soft, average, and loud. If a child has a sloping hearing loss, aided frequency responses using high-frequency sounds, such as the /s/ and /ʃ/ phonemes, should be obtained to assess whether frequency-lowering technology is required to achieve audibility of these sounds (Scollie et al., 2016).
Aided speech perception testing assists in the validation of hearing aid benefit. It can be completed at various input levels in quiet and in noise to help guide changes to hearing aid programming or in the overall plan of care. Information from speech perception testing and relevant questionnaires (e.g., auditory development, auditory performance) can be shared with the child’s SLP and/or teacher of the deaf to help determine the relative impact of speech perception issues versus speech production difficulties and to guide therapy goals.
Child and/or family feedback is necessary for validation of optimal hearing aid use and benefit. A variety of questionnaires and self-report tools can be used in this process. See UWO PedAMP for examples.
Aural (re)habilitation can be defined as “an ecological, interactive process that facilitates one’s ability to minimize or prevent the limitations and restrictions that auditory dysfunctions can impose on well-being and communication, including interpersonal, psychosocial, educational, and vocational functioning” (ASHA, 2001, p. 4). Habilitative services refer to those services focused on attaining listening, language, and communication skills that have yet to be acquired (e.g., in the case of a child who is identified with hearing loss prelingually). Rehabilitative services refer to those services focused on maintaining, reestablishing, and/or improving current listening, language, and communication skills. The aural (re)habilitative process is designed to be interactive, individualized, and child- and family-centered. The roles of audiologists and SLPs in the provision of (re)habilitation services for children using hearing aids may be complementary, interrelated, and, at times, overlapping.
An aural and communication (re)habilitation plan may include, but not be limited to, the following types of intervention.
Child and family counseling is designed to include
Education on the specifics of hearing technology may include participation from the child, their family and caregivers, and other professionals working with the child. Topics covered may include
Hearing aids provide children access to their auditory environments. However, listening can still be challenging (even when using hearing aids) with added background noise, reverberation, and distance from the speaker. Hearing assistive technology systems can help children receive better access to sound and speech in challenging environments.
Personal frequency modulation (FM) or digital modulation (DM) systems transmit speech signals directly from the speaker (through a microphone) to the child’s hearing aids. Personal FM and DM systems are frequently used in the school setting but may also provide benefit outside of school (e.g., in the car, in crowded places) and for young children not yet in school. Sound-field systems amplify the speaker’s voice over the background noise for everyone in the room.
As with hearing aids themselves, it is important that any hearing assistive technology system used by a child go through a verification process to ensure that it is working properly and is being used for maximum benefit. Clinical audiologists and educational audiologists can collaborate to ensure that any technology used by the child meets their needs both in and out of the classroom setting. For more information on this topic, see the ASHA resource on hearing assistive technology systems for children and visit the following two resources by Supporting Success For Children with Hearing Loss:
Providing strategies to adjust a child’s environment (e.g., home, child care, school, community settings) to maximize effective communication interactions may also be essential. Methods for modifying the environment for optimal communication may include
A child’s audiologist(s) and/or SLP will develop an individualized intervention plan that is specific to their needs and goals. The plan will be developed based on continued child and family participation—with consideration given to the communication systems and language(s) used by the child and their family, and in consultation with other members of the child’s care team (e.g., teacher of the deaf, occupational therapist). Components of an individualized plan may include, but not be limited to, the following:
Goals and interventions may change as the child’s skills and needs evolve and/or as the family identifies different priorities.
A child’s progress with and benefit from hearing aids may be measured in several ways and may require documentation by more than one professional (e.g., audiologist and SLP). Outcome measures are developed in a child- and family-centered manner. Outcomes may be tied to the ICF framework and may include measures related to
Outcomes, treatment benefit, and overall progress may be documented using questionnaires (McCreery & Walker, 2017), speech perception measures, and/or a periodic review of functional goals.
Children who are deaf and hard of hearing can qualify for educational services in a variety of ways. A child may have an individualized family service plan (IFSP), an individualized education program (IEP), or a Section 504 plan. ASHA’s resource on eligibility and dismissal in schools provides more information and resources.
Children under 3 years of age must be referred to the state Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities as soon as a hearing loss has been identified. Educational services for children ages birth to 3 are typically home based and often include a parent-coaching model. Any child who is older than 3 years of age is referred to their local area school system’s special education program.
Both modifications (e.g., altered curriculum) and accommodations (e.g., classroom acoustics, strategic seating) are important considerations when defining service plans for children who are deaf and hard of hearing.
ASHA’s resources on the following topics provide information on billing, reimbursement, and related issues regarding hearing aids:
This list of resources is not exhaustive, and the inclusion of any specific resource does not imply endorsement from ASHA.
Abrams, H. B., & Kihm, J. (2015). An introduction to MarkeTrak IX: A new baseline for the hearing aid market. The Hearing Review, 22(6), 16.
American National Standards Institute. (2014). Specification of hearing aid characteristics (Rev. ed.; ANSI S3.22-2014). Acoustical Society of America.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Knowledge and skills required for the practice of audiologic/aural rehabilitation [Knowledge and skills]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016a). Code of ethics [Ethics]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016b). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018). Scope of practice in audiology [Scope of practice]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Summary of 2019 national CDC EHDI data. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/2019-data/documents/01-2019-HSFS-Data-Summary-h.pdf [PDF]
Chasin, M. (2011). Setting hearing aids differently for different languages. Seminars in Hearing, 32(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1277240
Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers With Disabilities; Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities; Final Rule and Proposed Rule, 76 F.R. 60139 (proposed September 28, 2011) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 303). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2011-09-28/pdf/2011-22783.pdf [PDF]
Halpin, K. S., Smith, K. Y., Widen, J. E., & Chertoff, M. E. (2010). Effects of universal newborn hearing screening on an early intervention program for children with hearing loss, birth to 3 yr of age. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.3.5
Hearing Aid Devices; Conditions for Sale, 21 C.F.R. § 801.421 (2020). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-801/subpart-H/section-801.421
Hearing Aid Devices; Professional and Patient Labeling, 21 C.F.R. § 801.420 (2020). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-801/subpart-H/section-801.420
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (2019). Year 2019 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention, 4(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.15142/fptk-b748
Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Flax, M., Ching, T., & Brewer, S. (2011). The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Research, 1(1), 88–90.
McCreery, R. (2011). Pediatric hearing aid fittings: Selection and verification of features. AudiologyOnline. https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/pediatric-hearing-aid-fittings-selection-797
McCreery, R. (2013). Building blocks: RECD is a reasonable alternative to real-ear verification. The Hearing Journal, 66(7), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000432411.23573.80
McCreery, R. W., & Walker, E. A. (2017). Pediatric amplification: Enhancing auditory access. Plural Publishing.
McCreery, R. W., Walker, E. A., Stiles, D. J., Spratford, M., Oleson, J. J., & Lewis, D. E. (2020). Audibility-based hearing aid fitting criteria for children with mild bilateral hearing loss. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-OCHL-19-0021
Moeller, M. P., Carr, G., Seaver, L., Stredler-Brown, A., & Holzinger, D. (2013). Best practices in family-centered early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: An international consensus statement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(4), 429–445.
Mueller, H. G. (2001). Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress. Trends in Amplification, 5(2), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380100500202
Scollie, S., Glista, D., Seto, J., Dunn, A., Schuett, B., Hawkins, M., Pourmand, N., & Parsa, V. (2016). Fitting frequency-lowering signal processing applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and protocols. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 27(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15059
Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., Laurnagaray, D., Beaulac, S., & Pumford, J. (2005). The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends in Amplification, 9(4), 159–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380500900403
Seewald, R., Moodie, S., Scollie, S., & Bagatto, M. (2005). The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: Historical perspective and current issues. Trends in Amplification, 9(4), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380500900402
World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Content for ASHA’s Practice Portal is developed through a comprehensive process that includes multiple rounds of subject matter expert input and review. ASHA extends its gratitude to the following subject matter experts who were involved in the development of the Hearing Aids for Children page.
The recommended citation for this Practice Portal page is:
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d.). Hearing Aids for Children (Practice Portal). Retrieved month, day, year, from www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/hearing-aids-for-children/.