Citing generative AI is one key consideration when using generative artificial intelligence (AI) clinically. Make sure you also consider:
When using generative AI for scientific or research purposes, remember to follow these two cardinal rules:
AI in Scholarly Publishing: Positives and Pitfalls
This ASHA Leader article discusses the benefits of using AI in scholarly publishing and research—but reminds readers to proceed with caution and follow the authors’ tips to avoid pitfalls.
AI usage will vary depending on state and local laws as well as payer and facility policy. Here are some common ways that audiologists and SLPs might use generative AI:
Remember: Use of a generative AI tool is not a replacement for your clinical expertise. You are using your professional knowledge and expertise to craft prompts and free up your capacity to practice at the top of your license. Even when AI assists in that process, the end result is still your professional work—and your responsibility.
Clinicians who are new to AI—and even those who aren’t—may wonder when their use of generative AI might introduce ethical issues. If you find yourself in any of the situations mentioned below, you’ll have to consider how you’ll disclose content that you’ve created with generative AI.
See the following use cases of audiologists and SLPs citing generative AI when using it in their clinical practice.
Upon completing a comprehensive audiologic evaluation, an audiologist types a description of the documented hearing loss and their recommendation for follow-up with an ENT.
A school-based SLP wants to conduct a caregiver training presentation to families at the school.
Previous: Obtaining Informed Consent