Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) is the involuntary, intermittent, and episodic adduction of the larynx during inspiration. It is induced by specific irritants, exposures, and/or activities. During episodes, the vocal folds adduct partially or fully and restrict the passage of air to the lungs.
ILO is an umbrella term that includes both irritant-induced ILO (IILO) and exercise-induced ILO (EILO; Halvorsen et al., 2017). Speech-language pathologists (SLP) are involved in the diagnosis and direct behavioral management of ILO. There is considerable overlap between ILO and EILO.
Other terminology has been used to discuss ILO in the past, including vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) and paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM). For the sake of consistency, this page uses the term “ILO” throughout the document.
Incidence refers to the number of new cases of a disorder or condition identified in a specified time period.
Prevalence refers to the number of individuals who are living with the disorder or condition in a given time period.
Currently, there are no population-level studies investigating the incidence and prevalence of ILO. Incidence and prevalence estimates may additionally be impacted by frequent misdiagnoses, inconsistent diagnostic criteria and terminology, and an overall lack of awareness of ILO in the medical community (Halvorsen et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2015). As such, the following data should be interpreted with caution.
ILO may present with various signs and symptoms. Diagnosis is typically made with multidisciplinary input. SLPs play an instrumental role in the differential diagnosis of ILO and in determining the nature of ILO episodes and their potential triggers (Sandage et al., 2023).
Signs and symptoms may include the following:
A change in vocal quality can possibly occur before or during an episode of vocal fold adduction but is not considered to be a sign/symptom.
The exact cause (or causes) of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) is not known. However, some researchers suggest that these disorders may be related to changes in the responsiveness of laryngeal sensory nerve fibers, which result in the hypersensitivity of airway protective reflexes (e.g., laryngeal adductor reflex, laryngeal chemoreflex; Patel et al., 2015; Pathak et al., 2020). Although the etiology of ILO is not known, there may be identifiable triggers—events or situations that elicit an ILO event—such as the following:
SLPs play a central role in the screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of ILO. The SLP’s professional roles and activities include obtaining a comprehensive case history of the client as well as providing clinical/educational services (diagnosis, assessment, planning, and treatment); engaging in prevention and advocacy; and conducting education, administration, and research. See ASHA’s Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology (ASHA, 2016).
Appropriate roles for SLPs include, but are not limited to, the following.
As indicated in the ASHA Code of Ethics (ASHA, 2023), SLPs who serve this population should be specifically educated and appropriately trained to do so. This includes maintaining and documenting the highest level of competence in the areas of practice and recommending referrals to qualified professionals in areas outside of the SLP’s scope of practice.
ILO can co-occur with other conditions—including pulmonary disorders (e.g., asthma, laryngeal abnormalities, cardiac pathology; Reitz et al., 2014). Careful assessment and differential diagnosis by a multidisciplinary team is essential for ILO because of its complexity.
ILO can have multiple triggers (see the Causes section), some of which may require a unique treatment approach. Such triggers can be accompanying disorders, such as
If disorders such as RCC and/or BPD trigger ILO, SLPs may directly treat those disorders to indirectly treat ILO. See ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Aerodigestive Disorders and Sandage et al. (2023) for further information on BPD.
EILO, by definition, occurs only during exercise (typically in peak physical exertion), with symptoms resolving when exercise stops. ILO also mimics other medical conditions, including asthma, swelling and other reactions secondary to allergies, BPD, and panic attack, among others. See Sandage et al. (2023) for a comprehensive tutorial of differential diagnosis for ILO. Charts related to differential diagnosis of ILO from Sandage et al. are also included (with permission) in the Differential Diagnosis section below.
Ideally, ILO is diagnosed with continuous laryngoscopy during provocation. Similarly, EILO can be diagnosed with continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE; Hull et al., 2019). Data from pulmonary function testing can also be helpful for assessment and diagnosis (Christopher & Morris, 2010; Sterner et al., 2009).
A core multidisciplinary team may include
Other professionals (e.g., neurologist, cardiologist, sports medicine physician) may also be included on the team.
SLPs make necessary referrals and collaborate with those professionals if a multidisciplinary team does not exist. See ASHA’s resources on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) and collaboration and teaming.
Assessment and treatment of ILO may require the use of appropriate personal protective equipment and universal precautions.
An SLP may be the first health care professional to see an individual who is experiencing voice or breathing problems. See the Assessment section of ASHA’s Practice Portal page on Voice Disorders for specific screening information.
SLPs screen for the following changes:
If screening results indicate anatomical or neurological difficulties that suggest an underlying disease process, referral is made to an appropriate medical professional.
ILO may involve the interaction of multiple systems and other disorders (e.g., BPD, RCC). Individuals may present with multiple complaints and varied symptoms. Due to these complexities, differential diagnosis is critical.
Differential diagnosis of ILO involves a multidisciplinary approach (Centeno-Saenz et al., 2025). The SLP plays an essential role in diagnosis. They obtain a detailed case history, assess breathing patterns, perform skilled fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and synthesize test information from all other team members (Reitz et al., 2014). See Sandage et al. (2023) for further information on differential diagnosis.
Thorough case histories and sign/symptom assessments facilitate differential diagnosis. Case histories may include the following.
The following are suggested case history questions to assist in differential diagnosis.
| Behavioral |
|
| Environmental |
|
| Medical |
Was the patient previously diagnosed with:
|
Reprinted, with permission, from “Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction Differential Diagnosis in Adolescents and Adults: A Tutorial,” by M. J. Sandage, C. F. Milstein, and E. Nauman, 2023, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(1), 1–17 (https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00187).
The following chart supports differential diagnosis by explaining the presentation of variables (e.g., symptoms, triggers) across disorders that commonly co-occur with ILO.
| Variable | Irritant-induced ILO | Exercise-induced ILO | Asthma | Laryngeal edema: angioedema/anaphylaxis | Extrathoracic obstruction | Breathing pattern disorder | Laryngospasm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airway noise | Inhalation: stridor | Inhalation: stridor | Exhalation: wheezing | Inhalation and exhalation | Inhalation: sometimes stridor | Inhalation and/or exhalation | Inhalation and exhalation |
| Origin of noise | Larynx | Larynx | Lower airway | Larynx: hypopharynx | Larynx | Larynx | Larynx, subglottic space, or pharynx |
| Symptoms | Episodic throat tightness accompanied by difficulty inhaling; sometimes hoarseness | Throat tightness and inspiratory stridor only during exertion; ADLs typically not affected; sometimes hoarseness | Chest tightness with difficulty exhaling; no hoarseness | Throat closure and hoarseness/voice loss | Throat tightness; difficulty inhaling and exhaling, or taking a full breath in | Difficulty breathing in, may have throat and chest tightness, and fatigue | Throat closure, gasping for air, inability to breathe, anxiety, and panic |
| Triggers | Exposure to irritants, GERD/LPR | Physical exertion | Common triggers include air pollution, allergens, temperature change, smells, chemicals, fumes, emotions, etc. | Allergic reaction | Physical exertion | Physical exertion | GERD/LPR, exposure to irritants, postnasal drainage, anesthesia, extubation, laryngeal mucosal hypersensitivity |
| SLP role | Yes. Resolves with respiratory retraining therapy. | Yes. Resolves with respiratory retraining therapy. | No | No | Yes. May help identify the obstruction during endoscopic assessment. | Yes. Resolves with respiratory retraining therapy. | Yes. Education and strategies to lessen severity. |
| β-agonist response | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Note. ADLs = activities of daily living; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; LPR = laryngopharyngeal reflux; SLP = speech-language pathologist. Reprinted, with permission, from “Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction Differential Diagnosis in Adolescents and Adults: A Tutorial,” by M. J. Sandage, C. F. Milstein, and E. Nauman, 2023, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(1), 1–17 (https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00187).
The following chart supports differential diagnosis by explaining the presentation of variables (e.g., symptoms, triggers) across disorders that rarely co-occur with ILO.
| Variable | Irritant-induced ILO | Exercise-induced ILO | Panic attack | Respiratory laryngeal dystonia | Extrathoracic obstruction | Diaphragmatic flutter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airway noise | Inhalation: stridor | Inspiration: stridor | Possible | Inspiration: only while awake | N/A | Inspiration |
| Origin of noise | Larynx | Larynx | Larynx | Larynx | N/A | Larynx |
| Symptoms | Episodic throat tightness accompanied by difficulty inhaling; sometimes hoarseness | Throat tightness and inspiratory stridor only during exertion; ADLs typically not affected; sometimes hoarseness | Dyspnea, tachycardia, nausea, sweating, chest pain, paresthesia | Persistent difficulty inhaling during waking hours only. It is not episodic or trigger dependent. No difficulty during sleep; fatigue | Dyspnea, O2 desaturation, increased heart rate shortly after starting exercise; patient may experience anoxia | Periodic, audible inspiration that interrupts conversational speech; may occur mid-swallow, risking aspiration; no symptoms during sleep |
| Triggers | Exposure to irritants, GERD/LPR | Physical exertion | Situations that cause stress or no triggers: panic disorder | No triggers | Exercise | No triggers |
| SLP role | Yes. Resolves with respiratory retraining therapy. | Yes. Resolves with respiratory retraining therapy. | No | Yes. May help identify the condition. | Yes. May help identify the condition. | Yes. May help identify the condition. |
| β-agonist response | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Note. ADLs = activities of daily living; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; LPR = laryngopharyngeal reflux; SLP = speech-language pathologist. Reprinted, with permission, from “Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction Differential Diagnosis in Adolescents and Adults: A Tutorial,” by M. J. Sandage, C. F. Milstein, and E. Nauman, 2023, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(1), 1–17 (https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00187).
Respiration may be assessed under varied conditions, including at rest and during physical activity (e.g., walking, running), and in the presence of patient-identified triggers (e.g., strong smells). At times, clinicians may need to rely on client and care partner report for triggers that are difficult to create in a clinical environment.
Fiberoptic laryngoscopy (nasendoscopy is the preferable form of laryngoscopy) allows a clinician to see the entire larynx and pharynx during breathing. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy can allow a clinician to assess
Please see Chiang et al. (2012) for further reading on fiberoptic laryngoscopy for assessment of EILO.
Note: It may be possible to meet the criteria for ILO even when laryngeal adduction upon inhalation is mild or does not occur (Olin et al., 2014). For further reading, please see Halvorsen et al. (2017), Centeno-Saenz et al. (2025), Hull et al. (2016), Olin et al. (2016), and Heimdal et al. (2006).
SLPs conduct assessments in a manner that is responsive to each individual’s cultural background, personal beliefs/practices/habits, and preferences for medical intervention.
Ethnographic interviewing strategies can help in gathering useful information (Westby et al., 2003). Collaboration with other professionals (e.g., cultural broker, mental health provider, registered dietitian) may be beneficial. See ASHA’s Practice Portal pages on Cultural Responsiveness and Collaborating With Interpreters, Transliterators, and Translators for more information.
Decisions about goals and treatment options are made in partnership with the client, their care partners, and other professionals. As part of a multidisciplinary team, the SLP is involved in assessing the individual’s response to medical treatment and in implementing both indirect and direct strategies during or following medical treatment. See ASHA’s resources on interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP) and focusing care on individuals and their care partners
Speech therapy is the primary treatment for ILO. Comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment of the upper airway may include
SLPs provide behavioral treatment to address ILO. The nature, scope, and duration of speech-language therapy depends on
The goal of treatment is to establish a consistent pattern of vocal fold abduction during the breathing cycle to maintain a patent airway. This affirms that breathing is consistently achievable, even in the presence of environmental or activity-related triggers.
During treatment, the SLP focuses on behavioral changes/strategies (Reitz et al., 2014). Other disciplines may also be involved in treatment (e.g., medical intervention to treat reflux or allergy triggers, when present).
SLPs may teach strategies to individuals with ILO; such strategies are individualized based on triggers or other factors (Drake et al., 2017; Fujiki et al., 2023; Johnston et al., 2018; Mathers-Schmidt, 2001; Sandage & Zelazny, 2004; Vreim et al., 2025). One such strategy that may help individuals manage their ILO is respiratory retraining, which uses a variety of techniques (discussed below).
Many of the techniques listed below use a semi-occluded vocal tract to promote laryngeal abduction through negative back pressure.
Once the individual has identified their most effective breathing technique, the SLP may introduce challenges (triggers) while using the technique. These include the following:
For additional reading on therapeutic techniques, see Shaffer et al. (2018).
Prognosis depends on the appropriate identification of underlying causes and triggers as well as the individual’s ability to avoid noted triggers.
Providing appropriate procedure and diagnosis codes for evaluation and treatment is an important aspect of successfully billing for services. Payer policies often outline specific coverage guidelines relevant to procedure codes from the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®; American Medical Association, 2018) and diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM; World Health Organization, 2015).
ILO does not always present as a disorder of the respiratory and laryngeal systems that leads to voice, upper airway, or swallowing disorder. Coverage depends on how ILO directly relates to any of these conditions. Therefore, SLP documentation should clearly illustrate the effect of ILO on voice, the upper airway, and communication.
When billing for these services, SLPs use diagnosis and procedure codes for the assessment and treatment of voice and upper airway disorders. Payer policies regarding the coverage of ILO vary. Therefore, SLPs should verify coverage for each individual prior to billing for these services.
For more information about coding, see the following ASHA resources:
In addition to determining the type of treatment that is optimal for individuals with ILO, SLPs consider other service delivery variables—including format, provider, dosage, timing, and setting—that may affect treatment outcomes.
American Medical Association. (2018). CPT Professional Edition.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of practice]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics [Ethics]. https://www.asha.org/policy/
Bisdorff, B., Kenn, K., Nowak, D., Schlichtiger, J., Bäuml, J., Orban, E., & Radon, K. (2014). Asthma and vocal cord dysfunction related symptoms in the general population—A pilot study. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 113(5), 576–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2014.08.009
Centeno-Saenz, G. I., Patel, R. R., & Mickleborough, T. (2025). Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction history, mechanisms, and diagnostics across the globe. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 45(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2024.09.001
Chen, S. A., Kim, J. F., Krishna, P., Simmons, E., Crawley, B. K., & Murry, T. (2025). Cough suppression therapy in patients with chronic refractory cough and oropharyngeal dysphagia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 34(3), 1058–1064. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00345
Chiang, T., Marcinow, A. M., DeSilva, B. W., Ence, N., Lindsey, S. E., & Forrest, L. A. (2013). Exercise-induced paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder: Diagnosis and management. The Laryngoscope, 123(3), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23654
Christensen, P. M., Thomsen, S. F., Rasmussen, N., & Backer, V. (2011). Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions: Prevalence and symptoms in the general public. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 268(9), 1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1612-0
Christopher, K. L., & Morris, M. J. (2010). Vocal cord dysfunction, paradoxic vocal fold motion, or laryngomalacia? Our understanding requires an interdisciplinary approach. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 43(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.12.002
Drake, K., Palmer, A. D., Schindler, J. S., & Tilles, S. A. (2017). Functional outcomes after behavioral treatment of paradoxical vocal fold motion in adults. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 69(4), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484716
Ersson, K., Mallmin, E., Malinovschi, A., Norlander, K., Johansson, H., & Nordang, L. (2020). Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and laryngeal obstruction in adolescent athletes. Pediatric Pulmonology, 55(12), 3509–3516. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25104
Fujiki, R. B., Olson-Greb, B., Braden, M., & Thibeault, S. L. (2023). Therapy outcomes for teenage athletes with exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(4), 1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00359
Halvorsen, T., Walsted, E. S., Bucca, C., Bush, A., Cantarella, G., Friedrich, G., Herth, F. J. F., Hull, J. H., Jung, H., Maat, R., Nordang, L., Remacle, M., Rasmussen, N., Wilson, J. A., & Heimdal, J.-H. (2017). Inducible laryngeal obstruction: An official joint European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society statement. European Respiratory Journal, 50(3), Article 1602221. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02221-2016
Heimdal, J.-H., Roksund, O. D., Halvorsen, T., Skadberg, B. T., & Olofsson, J. (2006). Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: A method for visualizing laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. The Laryngoscope, 116(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000184528.16229.ba
Hicks, M., Brugman, S. M., & Katial, R. (2008). Vocal cord dysfunction/paradoxical vocal fold motion. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 35(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2007.09.005
Hull, J. H., Backer, V., Gibson, P. G., & Fowler, S. J. (2016). Laryngeal dysfunction: Assessment and management for the clinician. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 194(9), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201606-1249CI
Hull, J. H., Walsted, E. S., Feary, J., Cullinan, P., Scadding, G., Bailey, E., & Selby, J. (2019). Continuous laryngoscopy during provocation in the assessment of inducible laryngeal obstruction. The Laryngoscope, 129(8), 1863–1866. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27620
Jeppesen, K., Philipsen, B. B., & Mehlum, C. S. (2024). Prevalence and characterisation of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in patients with exercise-induced dyspnoea. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 138(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215123001494
Johansson, H., Norlander, K., Berglund, L., Janson, C., Malinovschi, A., Nordvall, L., Nordang, L., & Emtner, M. (2015). Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in a general adolescent population. Thorax, 70(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205738
Johnston, K. L., Bradford, H., Hodges, H., Moore, C. M., Nauman, E., & Olin, J. T. (2018). The Olin EILOBI breathing techniques: Description and initial case series of novel respiratory retraining strategies for athletes with exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. Journal of Voice, 32(6), 698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.020
Lee, J.-H., An, J., Won, H.-K., Kang, Y., Kwon, H.-S., Kim, T.-B., Cho, Y. S., Moon, H.-B., Song, W.-J., & Hull, J. H. (2020). Prevalence and impact of comorbid laryngeal dysfunction in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(4), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.906
Mathers-Schmidt, B. A. (2001). Paradoxical vocal fold motion: A tutorial on a complex disorder and the speech-language pathologist’s role. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2001/012)
Nielsen, E. W., Hull, J. H., & Backer, V. (2013). High prevalence of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(11), 2030–2035. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318298b19a
Olin, J. T., Clary, M. S., Connors, D., Abbott, J., Brugman, S., Deng, Y., Chen, X., & Courey, M. (2014). Glottic configuration in patients with exercise‐induced stridor: A new paradigm. The Laryngoscope, 124(11), 2568–2573. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24812
Olin, J. T., Clary, M. S., Fan, E. M., Johnston, K. L., State, C. M., Strand, M., & Christopher, K. L. (2016). Continuous laryngoscopy quantitates laryngeal behaviour in exercise and recovery. European Respiratory Journal, 48(4), 1192–1200. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00160-2016
Olin, J. T., Deardorff, E. H., Fan, E. M., Johnston, K. L., Keever, V. L., Moore, C. M., & Bender, B. G. (2017). Therapeutic laryngoscopy during exercise: A novel non-surgical therapy for refractory EILO. Pediatric Pulmonology, 52(6), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.23634
Patel, R. R., Venediktov, R., Schooling, T., & Wang, B. (2015). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of speech-language pathology treatment for individuals with paradoxical vocal fold motion. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(3), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0120
Pathak, S., Slovarp, L., Clary, M. S., & Jetté, M. E. (2020). Laryngeal chemoreflex in health and disease: A review. Chemical Senses, 45(9), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa069
Reitz, J. R., Gorman, S., & Kegyes, J. (2014). Behavioral management of paradoxical vocal fold motion. Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders, 24(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd24.2.64
Rundell, K. W., & Spiering, B. A. (2003). Inspiratory stridor in elite athletes. Chest, 123(2), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.2.468
Sandage, M. J., Milstein, C. F., & Nauman, E. (2023). Inducible laryngeal obstruction differential diagnosis in adolescents and adults: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00187
Sandage, M. J., & Zelazny, S. K. (2004). Paradoxical vocal fold motion in children and adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(4), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/034)
Shaffer, M., Litts, J. K., Nauman, E., & Haines, J. (2018). Speech-language pathology as a primary treatment for exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 38, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2018.01.003
Sterner, J. B., Morris, M. J., Sill, J. M., & Hayes, J. A. (2009). Inspiratory flow-volume curve evaluation for detecting upper airway disease. Respiratory Care, 54(4), 461–466.
Vreim, K., Karlsen, T., Carlsen, P. H., Nistad, V. H., Røksund, O. D., Halvorsen, T., Vollsæter, M., Heimdal, J.-H., Clemm, H., & Engan, M. (2025). Speech therapy for exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 282(3), 1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09190-y
Walsted, E. S., Famokunwa, B., Andersen, L., Rubak, S. L., Buchvald, F., Pedersen, L., Dodd, J., Backer, V., Nielsen, K. G., Getzin, A., & Hull, J. H. (2021). Characteristics and impact of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: An international perspective. ERJ Open Research, 7(2), Article 00195-2021. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00195-2021
Westby, C., Burda, A., & Mehta, Z. (2003, April). Asking the right questions in the right ways: Strategies for ethnographic interviewing. The ASHA Leader, 8(8), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR3.08082003.4
World Health Organization. (2015). International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th rev., Clinical Modification).
Content for ASHA’s Practice Portal is developed through a comprehensive process that includes multiple rounds of subject-matter expert input and review. ASHA extends its gratitude to the following subject-matter experts who were involved in the development of the Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction page:
ASHA seeks input from subject matter experts representing differing perspectives and backgrounds. At times a subject matter expert may request to have their name removed from our acknowledgment. We continue to appreciate their work.
The recommended citation for this Practice Portal page is:
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO). [Practice Portal]. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO)/.
Content Disclaimer: The Practice Portal, ASHA policy documents, and guidelines contain information for use in all settings; however, members must consider all applicable local, state and federal requirements when applying the information in their specific work setting.