Quality improvement (QI) is an ongoing process used to assess and improve work practices and client care across clinical and educational settings. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play an active role in QI efforts, and their practice may be shaped by QI initiatives.
To learn more about why QI matters, when and how to measure quality, and where QI efforts take place, see Quality Improvement.
To see examples of QI frameworks used in SLP-led initiatives across different health care environments, see Examples of Quality Improvement Activities.
This resource includes topics relevant to SLPs that help support safe, effective, and accountable care.
SLPs can use different models to guide QI efforts. The right model depends on the setting, goals, and available data. Below are a few common frameworks:
SLPs use PDSA to test small changes quickly.
For more information, see Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA): A Step-by-Step Approach (American Medical Association).
Developed by the Associates in Process Improvement, the Model for Improvement builds on the PDSA framework—with three guiding questions:
For more information, see the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Model for Improvement webpage.
RCA is a QI framework that is used after a mistake or a near-miss. It helps teams move beyond individual blame to identify contributing factors to the problem and develop preventive actions. This framework’s goals include the following:
For more information, see Root Cause Analysis and Medical Error Prevention (a book by NIH).
Part of the Lean Six Sigma methodology, DMAIC is a framework for fixing well-defined problems. This method is useful for reducing variation and improving efficiency in processes.
For more information, see Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) Methodology as a Roadmap in Quality Improvement (Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare).
FADE offers a structured and simplified approach for identifying a specific problem, analyzing contributing factors, developing targeted solutions, and carrying out and evaluating the results.
For more information, see FADE (Josie King Foundation).
The Lean A3 process uses a standardized one-page document to guide problem solving. Named after the paper size (A3), its format encourages clear thinking, team alignment, and accountability.
The A3 framework involves the following steps:
For more information, see Lean A3 Framework (Saskatchewan Health Quality Council).
To see examples of QI frameworks used in SLP-led initiatives across different health care environments, see Examples of Quality Improvement Activities.
Accreditation is a review process used to determine whether an organization meets established benchmarks or minimum standards of quality and accountability set by the accrediting body.
Accrediting groups like The Joint Commission review how health care organizations improve their services. They’ve shifted the focus from checking charts to ensuring that health care facilities are actively improving. Accrediting bodies assess the performance of a health care organization by looking at that organization’s patient care before, during, and after it happens.
Accrediting bodies assess the following key areas:
Accrediting bodies evaluate how SLPs and other providers address these factors both during care and after patient discharge.
Risk management is a process to identify, understand, and mitigate consequences that could impact patient safety, cost of care, and legal liability. Risk management looks at the following aspects of an organization:
Facilities often train SLPs and other staff on safety and risk management—including infection prevention, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and fall risk reduction strategies. Facilities conduct and document training based on the facility and/or state guidelines.
Like other providers, SLPs face risks related to infection control, patient safety, and legal liability. A strong risk management program helps prevent harm, reduce costs, and improve patient care (Dykes et al., 2023; McGowan et al., 2023). In health care, everyone shares responsibility for keeping patients safe and reducing risks, and this is often a part of the facility’s policies or QI efforts.
Consumer satisfaction is a key measure in QI. It tells us how consumers feel about the quality, effectiveness, and outcomes of the services that they receive.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), collecting consumer feedback can help
Collecting consumer feedback might be done through tools that are required by some insurance payers. One example is the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys—a tool used by CMS.
Facilities can use surveys and questionnaires to evaluate a patient’s perception of
For more information, you can review a sample of surveys from HCAHPS.
ASHA Resources
Other Resources