Audiologists, like all health care professionals, have a crucial responsibility to prioritize patient safety in their daily practice.
Ensuring patient safety involves
Prioritizing patient safety requires a comprehensive, ongoing commitment to both prevention and response—ensuring a safe, secure health care experience for every patient.
As audiologists and health care professionals, we are ethically bound to prioritize patient safety, uphold professional integrity, and advocate for equitable care. Principle of Ethics I of the Code of Ethics and Principle of Conduct I of the Code of Conduct state that ASHA-certified individuals “shall honor their responsibility to hold paramount the welfare of persons they serve professionally” (Code of Ethics).
Ethical considerations—such as informed consent, confidentiality, and equitable access—must guide every clinical decision and patient interaction. Additionally, audiologists must adhere to state laws, if applicable, that exist regarding duties to report suspected abuse or neglect of patients.
Moral distress is when institutional constraints, limited resources, or conflicting responsibilities hinder the audiologist’s ability to provide optimal care. Recognizing and addressing moral distress is essential to maintaining professional well-being and preserving ethical standards.
Health care professionals may experience moral distress during times when
Documentation of clinical services and patient information is essential for maintaining crucial lines of communication between providers, clinical staff, patients, payers, and family members. Documentation should always be comprehensive, readable, and clear—to prevent (a) breakdown in communication or (b) lack of—or loss of—information about patient services and care.
For further guidance and suggestions, refer to ASHA’s Documentation of Audiology Services webpage.
Clear communication is essential in audiology because it ensures that patients fully understand their hearing health, diagnostic evaluations, treatment recommendations, and further care. The audiologist is responsible for conveying complex medical and technical information in ways that are accessible and tailored to each patient’s needs—particularly because many patients are struggling with hearing-related challenges.
Health Literacy—or the ability to access, understand, and apply health information—plays an important role in patient safety. For individuals with hearing loss, communication barriers can further complicate health literacy. Examples of such barriers can include the following:
It is imperative that audiologists take the necessary steps such as those listed below to ensure that patients and their care partners understand their diagnoses, management plans, and follow-up care.
Unclear communication between audiologists and the patient (or care partner) can lead to any of these situations:
For more information on clear communication and health literacy, consult these resources:
In the profession of audiology, ensuring communication access and practicing culturally sensitive communication are not just ethical imperatives—they’re foundational to delivering equitable, effective care that honors every patient’s diverse backgrounds and communication needs.
Communication access means that people with communication disabilities have the same opportunities to take part in—and fully benefit from—high-quality services and programs as everyone else does. This access includes using necessary communication supports such as
Cultural responsiveness involves thoughtfully engaging with and addressing the unique blend of cultural factors and diverse identities that each person brings to any interaction. Culturally sensitive approaches
Recognizing and respecting cultural differences in health care approaches and communication styles supports access to care, trust building with patients, and better health outcomes for all individuals—regardless of cultural or linguistic background.
For additional information related to communication access and cultural responsiveness, see the following ASHA resources:
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are nonmedical factors that may impact patient safety by influencing individuals’ access to care, understanding of health information, ability to follow medical recommendations, and overall health outcomes.
These nonmedical factors include the following:
Here are some examples related to SDOH in the audiology profession.
Health Care Access and Quality
Economic Stability
For additional information on SDOH, see ASHA’s Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) webpage.
Infection control is critical for patient safety in the practice of audiology. Audiologists routinely encounter patients’ ears and bodily fluids; our equipment and supplies can serve as vectors for the spread of disease. Audiologists utilize materials and equipment that are either disposable or reusable.
Disposable items (single- use) in audiology can include ear tips, headphone covers, probe tubes, foam tips, and disposable gloves. Proper disposal is crucial to prevent cross-contamination.
Reusable audiology materials and equipment should be maintained in a clean and safe condition to support patient safety and equipment longevity. Without proper cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization protocols, items can harbor and transmit bacteria, fungi, or viruses. Reusable audiology materials and equipment include, but are not limited to
Adherence to infection control standards protects everyone from exposure—not only to our patients, but also clinicians and staff. Implementing consistent, evidence-based infection prevention practices support patient safety.
For additional information on infection control, see the following resources:
The Joint Commission—a health care accreditation organization—establishes national patient safety goals (NPSGs) to improve patient care. NPSGs are updated annually and may differ depending on the health care setting. To view the most recent safety goals by setting, see the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals webpage.
Patient safety in audiology isn’t just about maintenance of hearing devices—it also includes
Below are clinical considerations and examples related to patient safety that align with The Joint Commission’s NPSGs.
| Safety Goal | Relevance to Audiology | Example in Practice |
|---|---|---|
|
Ensure accurate patient identification. |
Prevents misidentification before evaluation or treatment. |
The audiologist confirms the patient’s name and birthdate before accessing electronic files for hearing aid fitting—reducing risk of identity error. |
|
Improve communication among caregivers. |
Ensures timely, accurate sharing of hearing-related findings. |
An infant fails her newborn hearing screening. The audiologist documents and communicates results clearly so parents or caregivers understand next steps for re-screening and evaluation. |
|
Identify and address patient safety risks. |
Addresses hearing loss–related fall risks and communication barriers. |
The audiologist screens patients for fall risk; educates patients and care partners on prevention; and refers to other providers for further care. |
|
Reduce risk of adverse events related to medications. |
Identifies bleeding risk during procedures like cerumen removal. |
The audiologist reviews medication history before ear cleaning in patients taking blood thinners and refers as needed. |
|
Prevent infections associated with equipment, devices, and supplies. |
Reduces risk of cross-contamination. |
After each patient, the audiologist removes disposable headphone covers and disinfects reusable parts with approved agents. The clinic maintains a log for equipment cleaning and maintenance. |
Interested in learning even more about patient safety and the audiologist?
See the following resources—both from ASHA and from other reputable audiology and allied health organizations—as well as reference articles that may be of interest for further reading and education.
Additional ASHA Resources
Related Resources
Bates, D. W., & Gawande A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(25), 2526‒2534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa020847
Gerberding, J. L. (2002). Hospital-onset infections: A patient safety issue. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(8), 665‒670. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00011
Leape, L. L. (2004). Making health care safe: Are we up to it? Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 39(3), 258‒266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.003
Leape, L. L., Berwick, D. M., & Bates, D. W. (2002). What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288 (4), 501‒507. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.4.501
Leape, L. L., Woods, D. D, Hatlie, M. J., Kizer, K. W., Schroeder, S. A., & Lundberg, G. D. (1998). Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(16), 1444‒1447. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.16.1444
Robinson, T. L., Ambrose, T., Gitman, L., & McNeilly, L. G. (2019). Patient safety in audiology. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 52(1), 75–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.08.017