View PDF Version of This Document View PDF Version of This Document

Professional Issues Statement

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Practice Policy

Professional Issues in Telepractice for Speech-Language Pathologists


About this Document

This professional issues statement was developed by the Ad Hoc Committee on Telepractice in Speech-Language Pathology, which was appointed in 2008 by the ASHA Board of Directors. Members of the committee were Pauline Mashima (chair), David M. Brennan, Michael Campbell, Diana Christiana, Vickie Pullins, and Janet Brown (ex officio). Vice President for Professional Practices in Speech-Language Pathology Brian Shulman (2006–2008) and Vice President for Speech-Language Pathology Practice Julie Noel (2009–2011) served as the ASHA monitoring vice presidents. ASHA staff members Janice Brannon and Amy Hasselkus also contributed to the statement. This document was approved by the ASHA Board of Directors (06-2010) in 2010. The statement was developed utilizing the experience and consensus views of this select group of experts. It is not a clinical guideline or evidence-based systematic review; rather, its purpose is to clarify aspects of this mode of service delivery.



Introduction

ASHA has tracked the use of remote service delivery by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) since 1998 and maintains updated information on its Web site (www.asha.org/telepractice). In 2004–2005, ASHA's Telepractice Working Group developed a position statement, technical report, and knowledge and skills statement to provide information and guidance about the use of telecommunications technology in speech-language pathology (ASHA, 2005d, 2005e, 2005f) and audiology (ASHA, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c). In response to the rapid advancement of technology and growing interest in this method of service delivery, an ad hoc committee was appointed to update the 2005 documents as needed. This document therefore serves as a supplement to the 2005 documents (ASHA 2005d, 2005e, 2005f), and the reader is advised to consult those documents to obtain a full perspective on issues related to service delivery at a distance.

Return to Top


Terminology and Definition

ASHA initially adopted the term telepractice rather than the frequently used terms telemedicine or telehealth to avoid the misperception that these services are used only in health care settings. Terminology has continued to evolve, and many disciplines have adopted terms specific to their professions. Other terms such as telespeech and teleaudiology and speech teletherapy may be used in addition to telepractice. Services delivered by SLPs and audiologists are also included in the broader generic term telerehabilitation (American Telemedicine Association, n.d.). For clarity and consistency, the term telepractice will be used throughout this document. Regardless of the term being used, ASHA adheres to the definition stated in the 2004 position statement:

Telepractice is the application of telecommunications technology to deliver professional services at a distance by linking clinician to client, or clinician to clinician for assessment, intervention, and/or consultation (ASHA, 2004a).

The position statement also includes an essential provision regarding quality and ethics:

The use of telepractice does not remove any existing responsibilities in delivering services, including adherence to the Code of Ethics, Scope of Practice, state and federal laws (e.g., licensure, HIPAA, etc.), and ASHA policy documents on professional practices. Therefore, the quality of services delivered via telepractice must be consistent with the quality of services delivered face-to-face (ASHA, 2004a).

For further clarification, face-to-face services will subsequently be referred to as in-person, since videoconferencing offers face-to-face communication at a distance. Supervision, mentoring, and pre-service or continuing education are other activities that may be conducted through the use of technology. However, these activities are not included in ASHA's definition of telepractice, and are best referred to as distance supervision and distance education. Such activities should be clearly described, as they may be regulated by universities and licensing, accrediting, and certifying organizations, as well as by payers.

Return to Top


Telepractice Services in Speech-Language Pathology

Technology provides opportunities to use a variety of communication modalities to interact with clients. However, not all uses of technology may be deemed telehealth encounters. Given the rapid emergence of technologies and programs, it is critical that the nature of the service and the role of the clinician during the service be clearly documented.

Return to Top


Telepractice Technology

The use of technology is an inherent element of telepractice. Specifications and selection of the appropriate equipment and connectivity will vary according to the telepractice application and desired outcomes. Technical support and training on use of telepractice equipment are essential elements for success; further, these needs will be ongoing as technology continues to evolve.

Return to Top


Quality of Telepractice Services

Quality assurance and collection of outcomes data should be an integral part of developing telepractice services. As with in-person services, telepractice services should be supported by available evidence. Elements of quality assurance include the competency of providers, selection of clients, appropriateness of technology to the service being delivered, identification of appropriate outcome measures, collection of data, and satisfaction of the client, caregiver, and provider.

Return to Top


Clinical Practice

In delivering clinical services via telepractice, it is important to establish criteria for candidacy, define expected outcomes, develop telepractice clinical protocols that are based on existing evidence, evaluate the effectiveness of services, provide staff education and training, and manage potential risk.

Return to Top


Licensure and Credentialing

SLPs should be aware of regulatory and credentialing issues in the states in which they practice, and comply with any existing regulations for telepractice.

Return to Top


Administrative

Prior to initiating a telepractice program, it is essential to gain the support of stakeholders including clinicians, clients, administrators, sponsors/payers, technical and support staff, teachers, multidisciplinary team members, and parents/family members. Knowledge of and advocacy for reimbursement mechanisms are critical to sustain telepractice programs.

Return to Top


Research Needs

Ongoing research is needed to expand the evidence base for telepractice.

Return to Top


Summary

Telepractice has the potential to significantly improve access to speech-language pathology services. As models of clinical service delivery continue to change and new technologies emerge, telepractice services will continue to evolve and expand. In turn, SLPs will need to acquire the necessary technical and clinical skills to practice telepractice competently, ethically, and securely for the benefit of their clients and families.

Return to Top


Glossary

Asynchronous: A method of exchanging information (such as “store and forward” transmission) that does not require the client and the provider to be available at the same time. Common examples of asynchronous communication may include e-mails, faxes, recorded video clips, audio files, virtual technologies, e-learning programs, and so on.

Bandwidth: A measure of the information-carrying capacity of a network. The quality of the visual and auditory signal is proportional to the amount of bandwidth; the higher the bandwidth, the greater the amount of data that can be transmitted in a given time period.

Computer Interfacing: The connecting of a computer to another device.

Document camera: A camera that captures and displays real-time images during a telepractice encounter (e.g., text, photos, objects).

Dual Streaming Presentation: The transmission of two compressed multimedia images at the same time.

Encryption: A system of encoding data to assure that it is shared only by authorized users.

Firewall: Computer hardware and software that block unauthorized communications between an organization's internal network (LAN) and the external network (WAN).

High Definition (HD): The increase in display or visual resolution from standard definition (SD).

Interoperability: The ability of two or more systems to interact with one another and exchange data to achieve predicable results.

Local Area Network (LAN): An internal network over a small geographic area.

Multipoint Call: The interactive communication between multiple users at more than two sites.

Network: A group of computers connected by hardware and software.

Synchronous: Interactive transmission of data occurring bidirectionally in “real time” and, therefore, requiring the client and the provider be available at the same time.

VPN (Virtual Private Network): A network that uses a public telecommunications infrastructure, such as the Internet, to provide remote offices or individual users with secure access to their organization's network.

WAN (Wide Area Network): An external network over a large geographic area that links LANs.

Return to Top


References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005a). Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Position statement. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005b). Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Technical report. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005c). Knowledge and skills needed by audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005d). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005e). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Position statement. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005f). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Technical report. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Code of ethics [Ethics]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

American Telemedicine Association. (n.d.). Telemedicine standards and guidelines. Retrieved from www.americantelemed.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3311.

Brennan, D. M., Georgeadis, A. C., Baron, C. R., & Barker, L. M. (2004). The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 10, 147–154.

Denton, D. R. (2003). Issues related to telepractice. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24, 313–322.

Duffy, J. R., Werven, G. W., & Aronson, A. E. (1997). Telemedicine and the diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 72, 1116–1122.

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 34 C.F.R, pt. 99 (2008).

Georgeadis, A. C., Brennan, D. M., Barker, L. M., & Baron, C. R. (2004). Telerehabilitation and its effect on storytelling by adults with neurogenic disorders. Aphasiology, 18, 639–652.

Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R. L., Rowan, L., & Creaghead, N. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech-language therapy provided by telepractice. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090608

Hill, A., & Theodoros, D. (2002). Research into telehealth applications in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8, 187–196.

Hill, A. J., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T. G., Cahill, L. M., Ward, E. C., & Clark, K. M. (2006). An Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: A pilot study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 45–56.

Information Management Group. (2001). Telehealth projects: A practical guide. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Ministry of Health Planning and Ministry of Health Services.

Jarvis-Selinger, S., Chan, E., Payne, R., Plohman, K., & Ho, K. (2008). Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: Lessons learned. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 720–725.

Krupinski, E., Dimmick, S., Grigsby, J., Mogel, G., Puskin, D., Speedie, S., & Yellowlees, P. (2006). Research recommendations for the American Telemedicine Association. Telemedicine and e-Health, 12, 579–588.

Krupinski, E., Nypaver, M., Poropatich, R., Ellis, D., Safwat, R., & Sapci, H. (2002). Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth. Telemedicine and e-Health, 8, 13–34.

Kully, D. (2000). Telehealth in speech-language pathology: Applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(2), 39–41.

Lewis, C. (2006). The telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. International Stuttering Awareness Day Online Conference, 2006 Virtual Conference. Retrieved from www.mnsu.edu/comdis/isad9/papers/lewis9.html.

McCullough, A. (2001). Viability and effectiveness of teletherapy for pre-school children with special needs. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 26, S321–S326.

Mashima, P. A., Birkmire-Peters, D. P., Syms, M. J., Holtel, M. R., Burgess, L. P. A., & Peters, L. J. (2003). Telehealth: Voice therapy using telecommunications technology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 432–439.

Mashima, P. A., & Doarn, C. R. (2008). Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 1101–1117.

O'Brian, S., Packman, A., & Onslow, M. (2008). Telehealth delivery of the Camperdown Program for adults who stutter: A Phase I trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 184–195.

Palsbo, S. E. (2007). Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13, 40–43.

Perlman, A. L., & Witthawaskul, W. (2002). Real-time remote telefluoroscopic assessment of patients with dysphagia. Dysphagia, 17, 162–167.

Rose, D. A. D., Furner, S., Hall, A., Montgomery, K., Katsavras, E., & Clarke, P. (2000). Videoconferencing for speech and language therapy in schools. BT Technology Journal, 18, 101–104.

Scheideman-Miller, C. (2004). Rehabilitation. In Tracy, J. (Ed.). , Telemedicine technical assistance documents: A guide to getting started in telemedicine (pp. 241–266). Available from http://telehealth.muhealth.org/general%20information/TAD.html.

Scheideman-Miller, C., Clark, P. G., Smeltzer, S. S., Cloud, A., Carpenter, J., Hodge, B., & Prouty, D. (2002). Two year results of a pilot study delivering speech therapy to students in a rural Oklahoma school via telemedicine. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Retrieved from www.hicss.hawaii.edu/HICSS_35/HICSSpapers/PDFdocuments/HCTMD06.pdf.

Sicotte, C., Lehoux, P., Fortier-Blanc, J., & Leblanc, Y. (2003). Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 253–258.

Spaulding, R. J., Doolittle, G., & Swirczynski, D. L. (2004). School-based telehealth. In Tracy, J. (Ed.). , Telemedicine technical assistance documents: A guide to getting started in telemedicine (pp. 267-313). Available from http://telehealth.muhealth.org/general%20information/TAD.html.

Theodoros, D., Hill, A., Russell, T., Ward, E., & Wootton, R. (2008). Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 552–559.

Theodoros, D. G., Constantinescu, G., Russell, T. G., Ward, E. C., Wilson, S. J., & Wootton, R. (2006). Treating the speech disorder in Parkinson's disease online. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(Suppl. 3), S3:88–S3:91.

Tindall, L. R., Huebner, R. A., Stemple, J. C., & Kleinert, H. L. (2008). Videophone-delivered voice therapy: A comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson's disease. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 1070–1077.

Tracy, J. A. (2004). First steps in creating a successful telehealth program. In J. A. Tracy (Ed.), Telehealth projects: A practical guide (pp. 6–22). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

University of Hawaii. (2001). Telemedicine curriculum [Online course]. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from www.tri.jabsom.hawaii.edu/curriculum/module0/default.htm.

Waite, M. C., Cahill, L. M., Theodoros, D. G., Busuttin, S., & Russell, T. G. (2006). A pilot study of online assessment of childhood speech disorders. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(Suppl. 3), S3:92–S3:94.

Ward, L., White, J., Russell, T., Theodoros, D., Kuhl, M., Nelson, K., & Peters, I. (2007). Assessment of communication and swallowing function post laryngectomy: A telerehabilitation trial. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13(Suppl. 3), S3:88–S3:91.

Wertz, R. T., Dronkers, N. F., Bernstein-Ellis, E., Sterling, L. K., Shubitowski, Y., Elman, R., & Deal, J. L. (1992). Potential of telephonic and television technology for appraising and diagnosing neurogenic communication disorders in remote settings. Aphasiology, 6, 195–202.

Wilson, L., Onslow, M., & Lincoln, M. (2004). Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: Five case studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 81–93.

Return to Top


Index terms: telepractice

Reference this material as: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Professional Issues in Telepractice for Speech-Language Pathologists [Professional Issues Statement]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

© Copyright 2010 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association disclaims any liability to any party for the accuracy, completeness, or availability of these documents, or for any damages arising out of the use of the documents and any information they contain.

doi:10.1044/policy.PI2010-00315