Barriers/Challenges to Successful Recruitment and
Retention
Both ASHA's 2008 Schools Survey (ASHA, 2008) and the study
of Ohio schools (Legislative Office of Education Oversight, 1999)
identified the most important considerations for SLPs seeking
employment. These included salary, working conditions,
advancement opportunities, and professional development
opportunities. Some of the barriers to achieving these
considerations are discussed below, based on ASHA's 2001
Omnibus Survey and 2000 and 2008 School Surveys (ASHA, 2001a,
2001b, 2008).
Low Salaries
Thirty-three percent of school-based SLPs report low salaries
as one of their greatest challenges (ASHA, 2008). This percentage
is down from thirty-eight percent reported in the 2006 ASHA
Schools Survey. Although the salaries of school-based SLPS seem
to be on the rise this still remains an issue of concern. The
effect over the years of the deficit in salary for school-based
SLPs may be a factor in problems related to their successful
recruitment and retention.
Difficult Working Conditions
Historically, inadequate or unacceptable working conditions
have discouraged SLPs from signing on and staying in the schools.
A recent study was conducted in Florida to elicit the
perspectives of SLPs working in public schools regarding the
features of the work environment that contribute or hinder to the
recruitment of SLPs. SLPS in 10 school districts in Central
Florida representing small, medium and large school districts
completed a questionnaire concerning factors in their work
environment that contributed to retention, factors that hindered
retention, and issues that may contribute to the recruitment and
retention of SLPs. Three hundred and eighty-two questionnaires
were returned, yielding a 64.5% response rate. Participants
ranked working with children, school schedules, and educational
setting as primary reasons for their satisfaction with the public
schools. Primary reasons for their dissatisfaction with working
in the public schools settings included: overwhelming workload,
role ambiguity, salary, and large caseloads (Edgar, Rosa-Lugo,
2007).
In a 2002 study conducted by Blood, Ridenour, Thomas, Qualls,
and Hammer, 2,000 practicing ASHA members were surveyed using a
job satisfaction survey. Results suggested that SLPs with smaller
caseloads were more satisfied with their job and that caseload
size was predictive of job satisfaction for SLPs working in
schools.
In the ASHA 2008 Schools Survey, concerns were expressed about
the high amount of paperwork (80%), lack of time for planning,
collaboration, and meeting with teachers (64%), high
caseloads/workloads (56%), lack of time for individual sessions
(44%), lack of understanding of the role of the SLP by others
(34%), low salaries (33%), inadequate work space and facilities
(28%), lack of parental involvement and support (24%) unfilled
positions (25%), lack of administrative support (22%), lack of
training for working with ELL students, hearing related
technology, assistive and alternative communication (ACC)
technology, or low incidence disorders (27%), and use of under
qualified personnel (13%). "Increased caseload" was the
most frequently selected impact in 2008 (79%), as it was in 2006
(79%) and in 2004 (83%) for SLPs who reported a shortage of
clinical service providers in their type of employment facility
and geographic area.
Excessive Paperwork
In the ASHA 2008 Schools Survey, 79% of the SLPs reported
excessive paperwork as their greatest professional challenge.
This has been consistent from 2000-2008; the vast amount of
respondents reporting that "high amount of paperwork"
was their greatest professional challenge.
Insufficient Planning/Meeting Time
Of the SLPs surveyed in the ASHA 2008 Schools Survey, 64%
reported lack of time for planning, collaboration, and meeting
with teachers. The reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA '04) and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) laws
emphasize speech-language services linked to the general
curriculum making time for collaboration critical. These
barriers/challenges may explain why a higher percentage of new
graduates prefer employment in health care settings rather than
in schools (Frederick Schneiders Research, 1998).
Additional studies indicate common reasons for dissatisfaction
among teachers. Some of these factors are worth noting as they
have implications for the factors contributing to the recruitment
and retention of school-based SLPs.
Some researchers do not see a teacher shortage per se. The
report "No Dream Denied: A Pledge to America's
Children" (National Commission on Teaching and America's
Future , 2003) indicates that schools do not generally lack newly
credentialed candidates to choose from; instead, they are rapidly
losing the newly hired teachers they already have. Over the past
10 years, the number of new teachers entering the workforce has
rapidly increased. The report further states that the real crisis
is created by the large number of beginning teachers who leave
the profession ("teacher attrition") before they can
become the kind of high-quality teachers who consistently improve
student learning. Currently, the rate of attrition among
beginning teachers is astronomical.
According to the 2005 Metlife Survey of the American Teacher
(Harris Interactive, 2005), although two thirds of new teachers
and three quarters of principals are very satisfied with their
careers, teachers are leaving the profession in great numbers.
The departure of teachers has been documented in several recent
studies. In 2001, overall turnover rate in education was 13%
(Ingersoll, 2001). For new teachers leaving the profession, the
rates of departure jump significantly, particularly in at-risk
schools. A report from 2000 found that one fifth of beginning
teachers left the profession within their first 4 years (Henke,
Chen, Gels, & Knepper, 2000). The turnover rate then jumps to
almost 50% for new teachers in high-poverty schools, according to
a 2005 report by Berry and Hirsch. Retaining qualified teachers
is important for the future of the profession and also for
economic reasons. In 2003, the National Commission on Teaching
and America's Future (NCTAF) estimated that the average cost
to recruit, hire, prepare, and then lose a teacher is $50,000. In
a 2007 Commission report, the different costs associated with
teacher attrition both for the school and the district's central
office was analyzed. The report estimates that individual urban
schools spend $70,000 a year on costs associated with teacher
transfers-whether they leave the district or not. Nonurban
schools spend $33,000 each. An urban district central office is
estimated to spend another $8,750 for every teacher that leaves
the district, while nonurban school districts spend $6,250. When
all of these costs are combined, NCTAF places the costs to hire,
recruit, and train the replacement teachers for all schools and
districts across the country at $7.34 billion. (National
Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 2007).
In the context of the attrition of teachers through the
beginning retirement of the Baby Boom generation, the loss of
teachers at the very start of their careers highlights the
importance of retaining qualified teachers and understanding the
various predictors involved in teachers and principals departing
from their professions.
The National Commission on Teaching and America's
Future's study identified factors that can significantly
predict why a teacher would be likely to leave the profession to
go into a different profession in the next 5 years:
- Not satisfied with teaching as a career
- Feels as if their job is not valued by their
supervisor
- Feels stress and anxiety related to reviews by their
supervisor
- Feels stress and anxiety related to personnel issues,
union, low pay, teacher conflict, discipline, complaints, and
incompetence
- Feels stress and anxiety related to unrealistic demands,
workload, number of responsibilities
- Fewer years of experience teaching
- Minority teacher
- Feels stress and anxiety related to safety
- Feels stress and anxiety related to budget/lack of
funding/financial constraints
- Finds making a contribution to society a source of greatest
teaching satisfaction
- Feels stress and anxiety related to lack of resources
- Finds pay/salary a source of greatest teaching
satisfaction
"The Condition of Education 2005" report published
by the National Center for Education Statistics (2005) found that
at the start of the 1999-2000 school year in both low- and
high-poverty schools, 85% of teachers had been at the school the
previous year. (High-poverty schools tend to draw new hires from
the ranks of new graduates and second-career professionals, while
wealthier schools draw experienced teachers transferring from
other schools. Teachers are reported as more likely to transfer
from a poor school than from a wealthy school. Children in
high-poverty schools tend to be taught by less experienced
professionals.) The majority of teachers leaving either a school
or the entire field reported that they were leaving because of
workloads that were too heavy and because of the absence of
planning time.