April 15, 2008 Features

Strategic Planning in CSD Programs: The San Francisco State Example

For many faculty members in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) training programs, the words "strategic planning" create a desire to find the nearest exit. However, faculty members in the Communicative Disorders Program (CD) at San Francisco State University (SFSU) have remained engaged in a comprehensive strategic planning process for more than two academic years. We have found the process to be time-consuming, complex, difficult, and tedious—as well as inspiring and rewarding. Several tools and strategies have helped us reach milestones in this process, and we have become collectively engaged in the process of continually improving our training program to meet the future.

The Context for Strategic Planning

Prior to the implementation of the 2005 ASHA certification standards in speech-language pathology, SFSU's CD program joined CSD programs throughout the United States to evaluate and re-align our curriculum with the new standards. Since 2005, several key resources and initiatives sparked the current process of program improvement, including the Quality Indicators for Integration of Clinical Practice and Research: Program Self Assessment Pilot Program (ASHA, 2007a) and the Speech-Language Pathology Education Summit (ASHA, 2007b). Each of these initiatives influenced the strategic planning process in different ways and provided cohesion to changes suggested by faculty members, students, graduates, and community professionals in speech-language pathology and audiology in the San Francisco Bay area.

The Process of Strategic Planning

The development of a formal program planning process began quite informally with discussions and planning at a CD faculty retreat prior to the fall 2006 semester. During the daylong retreat, several innovative ideas were suggested to strengthen curricular elements and to increase coordination between course and clinical instructors. From this informal beginning, the application of ASHA's Quality Indicators survey provided a tool to guide our program analysis. The indicators are a Web-based tool that helps academic and clinical faculty to develop a shared vision for successful integration of clinical practice and research in five key areas: general curriculum, coursework, faculty preparation, students, and clinical practicum. Initially, the indicators survey served as a starting point for discussions to enhance evidence-based teaching and learning. The Quality Indicators later took on a leading role and were a guiding source for evaluating the CD program.

Steps in the development of the program improvement process continued throughout the 2006–2007 academic year. By adapting the participatory action research model in part attributed to Whyte (1992), the evaluation of the SFSU CD program began to take shape. Whyte proposed that social and organizational change requires the input of those most affected by the changes. Key stakeholders in the process included future employers, practicing speech-language pathologists, CD faculty, and students. A multi-phase process gathered input in the following sequence: 

  • Advisory Council and Open House (October, 2006). Community-based SLPs, employers, current students, and faculty were invited to review the SFSU CD program during an open house that featured demonstrations of curriculum and clinical training components. A survey was completed by invited CD Community Advisory members to determine program strengths and needs for improvement.
  • SFSU CD Program Self-Assessment (November–December, 2006). SFSU CD program faculty reviewed the results from the Advisory Council survey to identify areas for improvement. In addition, the Quality Indicators tool was used and discussed by faculty to identify areas for improvement in academic and clinical training. Curriculum revisions and collaboration with clinical instructors were accomplished through several focused discussions at CD faculty meetings.
  • ASHA's SLP Education Summit (February, 2007). A faculty member participated in the summit, which focused on preparing SLPs for the future workplace, leading to continued discussion and evaluation of the SFSU CD program using the framework of questions from the summit. 
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Survey (April, 2007). Following discussion and development of indicators of professional excellence for future SLPs, an Internet survey was posted for one month. Focus groups also were held with current students to identify their perceptions of program strengths and weaknesses in preparing for future careers. A total of 70 participants responded to the focus groups and/or the online survey, including CD program faculty, community-based clinical instructors and SLPs, and current and past students. Survey results were analyzed to identify specific program quality indicators, which were adapted from ASHA's tool and placed into an action plan for program improvement. 
  • CD Faculty Retreat (July, 2007). CD faculty reviewed the survey results to revise the program mission statement and refine the plan of action. Following the completion of a newly drafted mission statement, materials were circulated for additional review by all CD program faculty, including goals for the upcoming academic year as well as specific assignments for designated leaders in each initiative area. 
  • CD Program Revision Plan (September, 2007). Following the development of the updated SFSU CD mission statement, goals, objectives, and activities in the strategic planning process, CD program faculty developed a program revision plan. Several courses have been revised and the overall program reflects more comprehensively the ASHA speech-language pathology Knowledge and Skills Acquisition (KASA) and Scope of Practice
  • Ongoing Program Evaluation (academic year 2007–2008). Bimonthly progress reports are provided at each CD faculty meeting. Input is gathered from various stakeholders, including lecturers,
    clinical instructors, and representatives from the
    National Student Speech Language Hearing
    Association. In addition, formal review of the strategic plan is conducted quarterly during CD faculty meetings.

Results of Our Process

Now into the second academic year, our accomplishments include:

  • Revision of the CD program mission and goals 
  • Development of the CD program strategic plan 
  • Re-activation of the CD Community Advisory Council 
  • Re-alignment of curriculum to better meet ASHA standards 
  • Establishment of a dynamic process to prepare SLPs for current and future work environments

Over the past two academic years, faculty members developed many innovations to address the revised mission statement and program goals (see sidebar on page 28) and to advance the curriculum forward with current research and practice. This plan serves as a framework to prioritize our burgeoning ideas and projects. The strategic plan is reviewed annually by the CD Advisory Council, with input from stakeholders.

Lessons Learned

Although we have accomplished many of our objectives, future challenges include expanding curriculum, coordinating academic and clinical training, and linking research to practice. The process broadened the perspective of faculty members to include the perspective of the department as a whole. Discussions lifted issues of pedagogy out of the classrooms and into broader, department-wide conversations, helping reveal common philosophies and define different teaching strengths. Most importantly, we have strengthened connections and focused on common goals for the clients and families we serve.

Nancy B. Robinson, is academic program coordinator in the Communicative Disorders Program at San Francisco State University (SFSU). Her research, teaching, and clinical supervision focus on augmentative and alternative communication, early language intervention, and family support. Contact her at nancyr@sfsu.edu.

Minnie S. Graham, is a professor in the Communicative Disorders Program at SFSU. She teaches seminars in voice disorders, stuttering, and counseling in communicative disorders, and supervises the Alaryngeal Speech Clinic. Contact her at mgraham@sfsu.edu.

Laura Epstein, an assistant professor at SFSU, specializes in bilingual language development, phonological disorders, literacy, and clinical processes. Contact her at lepstein@sfsu.edu.

Bishop J. Graham, coordinator of the SFSU Communicative Disorders Clinic, facilitates coordination between academic and clinical faculty and develops new and innovative training opportunities for students, specifically targeting underserved preschool populations. Contact him at bjgcd@sfsu.edu.

cite as: Robinson, N. B. , Graham, M. S. , Epstein, L.  & Graham, B. J. (2008, April 15). Strategic Planning in CSD Programs: The San Francisco State Example. The ASHA Leader.

Revising the Mission Statement and Program Goals

To revise the mission statement and program goals, faculty, students, and community members reviewed a draft developed during spring 2007. Their input resulted in a mission statement and goals that reflect national guidelines and local concerns and represent the unique qualities of our program:

The mission of the Communicative Disorders Program (CD) at San Francisco State University (SFSU) is to prepare professionals to provide competent and compassionate service to people with communication disorders across the lifespan. The SFSU CD Program is based on the following core values: collaboration; compassion; resilience; inquiry and investigation; life-long learning; professionalism; multiculturalism, and internationalism.

Following review of the Qualitative Indicators by faculty and stakeholders, the indicators were adapted to include the following goals to guide program action planning:

  • Promote a climate in which collaboration with all partners in the service of persons with communicative disorders is the core of clinical service.
  • Demonstrate understanding of the perspectives of people with disabilities and their family members, through compassion for all participants and perspectives in communicative disorders. 
  • Obtain cultural competence in coursework and clinical experiences in the context of the unique cultural and linguistic diversity of the San Francisco Bay Area. 
  • Participate in learning experiences across the continuum of professional development, from foundation course work in communication disorders for undergraduate students, to graduate education in speech-language pathology and audiology, to continuing education and life-long learning. 
  • Develop resilience and skills necessary for future and current professionals to thrive in the workplace of the future. 
  • Promote clinical competence through the development of self-evaluation and analysis of the clinical interaction that builds a professional sense of self in all interactions. 
  • Embody a teaching and learning environment to foster critical thinking, research and inquiry throughout academic and clinical experiences, thereby instilling the principles of life-long learning. 
  • Promote evidence-based practice in the application of research in clinical services, and thereby adhere to the highest standards of science and efficacy. 
  • Participate in international study and clinical exchange opportunities in communication sciences and disorders, with a focus on the promotion of an international world view for our profession that is inclusive of all peoples and cultures.


Additional Resources

The following resources may be of interest to academic and clinical faculty:



References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2007a). Quality Indicators for Integration of Clinical Practice and Research: Program Self-Assessment Pilot Program. Retrieved on January 30, 2008, from http://www.asha.org/academic/teach-tools/QIAssess.htm

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2007b). SLP Education Summit Resources. ASHA SLP Education Summit, February 1-4, 2007, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved on January 30, 2008, from http://www.asha.org/events/SLPEdSumRes.htm.

Whyte, W. F. (1992). Social Theory for Action: How Individuals and Organizations Learn to Change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.  



  

Advertise With UsAdvertisement